SANTO DOMINGO. - The bicameral commission that drafted the bill to increase the health sector’s wages suggests levying a 0.25% tax on the interests on bank deposits to sustain it, and was assigned to the Senate Budget Commission yesterday.
It also suggests applying taxes on Central Bank investment certificates, betting parlors, lottery tickets, checks of any type paid by financial intermediary organizations and payments through wire transfers.
The funds collected from those taxes would reach RD$2.7 billion and would be applied in the following manner: 40% wage increase for doctors; 30% for deontologists, nurses, pharmacists, psychologists and biocatalysts, and 40% for retired doctors whose pension doesn’t exceed RD$30,000.
The bill will benefit health professionals who work in the Public Health Ministry, the Dominican Social Security Institute and the Dominican Dermatology Institute (IDD).
The bill stipulates that the increases will be applied according to criteria and conditions of adherence to schedules, efficiency in the services and incentives for distance, agreed between the Medical Association and the Public Health Ministry.

Another note, reducing corruption and improving service delivery would go a long way to addressing the state capacity. Right now, an increase in taxes goes towards what? the increased salaries of Senators, or the CC judges? I don't want my money going to that end. Or paying for the myriad number of "botellas" that the political parties give out to their supporters. I'd be happy to pay for an efficient government!!!
And to add insult to injury; If you borrow now you'll probably pay back more interest on the loan.
Burning the worker's candle at both ends.
Double jeopardy.
What they encourage is---Don't bank, don't borrow, wait on the almighty government and the now-it-alls to legislate reforms.
http://www.dominicantoday.com/dr/....inican-banks-lower-interest-rates
Thus, keeping deposits in the RD is very much less attractive so, lets continue to expect the RD$ pesos to depreciate! In the short term, 45:1 maybe a good short term target.
The article is the lowering the interest rates on loans-Less interest less payment (in theory) however you seemed to have left out if the US Embassy had anything to do with it. LOL
(Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary's proverb)