Close Gallery
Mine at Cotui. Phot Barrick Gold.
Zoom Picture

Foreign investors criticize a possible revision of a 2009 contract with Barrick Gold

COTUI, Dominican Republic – Surrounded by one of the poorest provinces in the Dominican Republic, Canada-based Barrick Gold recently started production on its $3.8 billion joint venture gold mine Pueblo Viejo. Barrick manages the mine and owns 60 percent while Canada-based Goldcorp owns the remaining 40 percent.

The mine is the largest foreign investment ever in the Dominican Republic and is expected to have a significant impact on the country’s future exports and GDP, helping diversify and strengthen an economy that traditionally has been dependent on tourism revenues and remittances.

The Pueblo Viejo mine is expected to account for 15 percent of the value of Dominican exports and 2.9 percent of its GDP within the next decade, according to a recent report from Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining at Queensland University’s Sustainable Minerals Institute. By comparison, all mining activity in the Dominican Republic only accounted for 0.4 percent of GDP in 2010, according to the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

However, the government of President Danilo Medina is now considering revising the country’s 2009 contract with Barrick, the world’s largest gold miner, in an effort to raise more money as it faces a major fiscal crisis. The crisis led it to implement a series of new and widely unpopular taxes, which business leaders say will likely lead to a 25 percent drop in retail sales during the first half.  They also criticized that the government raised taxes without making any significant cuts in public spending. The Dominican Republic ranks last worldwide among 144 nations when it comes to government waste, according to the latest Global Competitiveness Report from the World Economic Forum.

The possible revision of the Barrick contract is being criticized by foreign investors and is seen as a dangerous signal for future investments. “The rules of the game cannot be changed,” says Salvador Demallistre, executive director of the Dominican Association of Foreign Investors (ASIEX).  Companies need long-term stability when they make their investment decisions, he says.

William Malamud, executive vice president of the American Chamber of Commerce in the Dominican Republic, agrees.

“This sends a very negative signal to current and potential investors in the Dominican mining sector, as can be seen in the stock price of Barrick and Goldcorp.,” he says. “Barrick’s Pueblo Viejo mining project is tremendously important for the country.”

First of all, it is effectively managing the remediation of a significant environmental liability that was left when the mine was bankrupted by the Dominican government, Malamud says.  Barrick has invested more than $375 million to clean up waste left behind by Rosario Dominicano, a state mining company that in 1999 abandoned the mine where Pueblo Viejo is now operating, leaving a trail of massive pollution.

Second, the project provides significant employment and technology transfer, as well as generating much needed foreign exchange, thereby bolstering macroeconomic stability at a time when the Dominican Republic has been running growing fiscal and current account deficits, Malamud points out.

Third, there is are significant mineral deposits on the island that are in early stages of development, and if the signal by the government is that contracts on major projects are not binding, then this would raise the perception of risk and thereby dissuade future investment in the sector – especially investment by the more responsible players in the sector, he argues.

Fernando Gonzalez Nicolas, president of the Roundtable of Commonwealth Countries in the Dominican Republic, also criticizes the possible Barrick revision. "To review recently formalized contracts could indicate a lack of institutionalism, formalism and continuity of government,” he said during the Energy Forum hosted by the Institute of the Americas last week, according to a report in local newspaper Hoy.

When the Dominican government reached its original deal with Barrick in 2009 it was seen as the best possible one for the country and also one of the best any country, including mining veteran Peru, had ever negotiated, Demallistre points out.

The possible revision isn’t Barrick’s only headache.

The company has had to face a wave of local protests – often violent – by demonstrators demanding jobs at the mine.

“Most of the young people are unemployed [and are demanding] that they are given a share [of jobs at Barrick],” says Sadoki Duarte, who has led several of the protests in Cotui.

Consesar Hernandez, president of the government-appointed Council for Managing Mining Funds (Fomisar) agrees. “The employment creation was not what was expected,” he says. “Most of the jobs went to people that were from outside the province.”

During the original construction phase, Barrick employed as many as 11 000 people, but now that number dropped to less than 2,000 as the mining company started normal production last month.

Barrick has also had to face mismanagement of funds by a local politician. Cotui mayor Rafael Molina Lluberes spent money the city received from Barrick to pay his own legal expenses although the funds were specifically earmarked for community expenses. The move caused widespread anger at the mayor, who also has been criticized for mishandling negotiations with Barrick over how funds should be distributed.

However, the real money will come once the area starts receiving 5 percent of the government’s Barrick payments. The original contract between Barrick and the government stipulated that 5 percent of the government’s income would be paid to the local communities around the mine, but it didn’t specify how the money will be managed or who would do so. Locals hope Barrick will be able to distribute the funds directly to the local communities rather than through the central government.

“If Barrick’s money is sent to the government we won’t see anything,” Duarte says.

Similar sentiments are shared by Hernandez and Emerito Paulina, the mayor of Angelina, a town near the mine. Paulina has submitted various proposals to the central government asking that the funds be paid directly to the Commonwealth of Southern Cibao, which groups all the cities around the mine except for Cotui.

Behind the skepticism against the central government is a combination of factors. First of all, the government’s fiscal crisis may tempt it to use the 5 percent to cover its own needs, locals fear. Second, is a history of government waste in using public funds.

Despite the signals from both the government and legislators, it is unclear how and even if the Barrick contract will be revised.

“We are very confident in the integrity of the agreement we have in place,” Barrick spokesman Andy Lloyd told Bloomberg. “It is legally binding on both the company and the state and cannot be changed unilaterally by either party.”

The Dominican Republic has so far enjoyed a relatively good image among foreign investors, but a revision of the Barrick contract will clearly ruin that.

News of the possible revision has already hurt the country’s image. “The market may be starting to re-evaluate its mild preference for the ruling party after the taste it seemed to show for resource nationalism this week,” the Financial Times wrote on Thursday.

“Amcham hopes that the Dominican government will carefully weigh the costs and benefits of capriciously changing the terms of long-term capital intensive projects, and instead focus on providing a secure and transparent investment climate that will facilitate responsible investment in this strategic sector of the economy,” Malamud says.

© Copyright Latinvex

Written by: Joachim Bamrud
Share / Recommend this article: FacebookFacebook Digg thisDigg this del.icio.usdel.icio.us TechnoratiTechnorati YahooYahoo Facebook
COMMENTS
22 comment(s)
Written by: ohhhvictor, 6 Feb 2013 10:23 AM
From: United States

The possible revision of the Barrick contract is being criticized by foreign investors and is seen as a dangerous signal for future investments. “The rules of the game cannot be changed,” says Salvador Demallistre, executive director of the Dominican Association of Foreign Investors (ASIEX)

yeah, right!
This is a extremely bias article, and it will deteriorate the life of millions of Dominicans..
These crooks are selling espejitos por oro ..The same thing after 1492..

Haven't we learn anything yet?


And we dominicans are all stupid ..right?
Written by: Gringo_1, 6 Feb 2013 10:35 AM
From: Dominican Republic, Maimon (Bonao)
Victor, your an idiot and haven't learned anything. And why do you want to oppress the Dominican people by driving away the companies that create jobs?
Written by: ohhhvictor, 6 Feb 2013 10:44 AM
From: United States
Gringo -F...

You ARE the idiot here..

Havent you seen the riots of people demanding jobs because they brought the whole crew of peruvian miners?

Didnt you realize that when the 300 peruvian miners got intoxicated NONE of them were dominicans?

So, if there is no jobs, no penny for dominican state AFTER 5 years ( incredible contract), they are poisoning the water, they destroy the ecosystem FOREVER, they dont plant a single tree, they are doing an OPEN LOOTING, and they dont bring ANY benefit to the dominican state..



What the hell are they doing in my country?
Written by: Tomas, 6 Feb 2013 11:46 AM
From: Dominican Republic, Cabrera
Lots of stuff we, (the public) don't know about here.
Barrick is a world wide miner that is well known for
thier sneaky agreements!
Someone should read the agreement & nutshell it for
the general public.
Yes, Barrick should make lots of money, but not at the expense
of Dominicans & the environment!
Written by: josean, 6 Feb 2013 11:48 AM
From: United States, Fighting the Dictatorship of the Narco PLD Mafia; Guillermo Moreno President 2016


"Written by: Gringo_1, 6 Feb 2013 10:35 AM
From: Dominican Republic, Maimon (Bonao)
Victor, your an idiot and haven't learned anything. And why do you want to oppress the Dominican people by driving away the companies that create jobs?"




We have been waiting for Foreign Investment PROSPERITY Since 1492!

Rather they have been the Greatest Contributors to our “Oppression!”



Written by: josean, 6 Feb 2013 12:11 PM
From: United States, Fighting the Dictatorship of the Narco PLD Mafia; Guillermo Moreno President 2016


This is Why You Can't Believe any of these Corporate Crooks or their Bull Horns!


File this one Under Figures Don’t Lie but Liars Do Figure!

josean had been saying for years that the Wall Street Ratters that the PLD and their Clapping Seals here at DT loved to use to justify their Economic PURPLE Smoke and Mirrors are bunch of Crooks just like them.

Well apparent the Government of the United States agrees with crazy josean:

WALL STREET JOURNAL

U.S. Sues S&P Over Ratings

Justice Department Says Endorsements of Risky Mortgage Bonds Fueled Crisis

By JEAN EAGLESHAM, JEANNETTE NEUMANN and EVAN PEREZ

The Justice Department sued Standard & Poor's Ratings Services late Monday, alleging the firm ignored its own standards to rate mortgage bonds that imploded in the financial crisis and cost investors billions.

Read the rest at:

online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324445904578284064003795142.html


Written by: Ricardolito, 6 Feb 2013 2:20 PM
From: Dominican Republic, calle A.Portes
There has to be a subject that Josean can contribute to with some experience or insight ,,I will await that time with pleasure
Written by: ohhhvictor, 6 Feb 2013 2:24 PM
From: United States


LOL!

Excellent ricardolito!
Written by: josean, 6 Feb 2013 2:30 PM
From: United States, Fighting the Dictatorship of the Narco PLD Mafia; Guillermo Moreno President 2016


Two of my most dedicated follwers!


Written by: anthonyC, 6 Feb 2013 4:02 PM
From: United States
Written by: ohhhvictor, 6 Feb 2013 10:44 AM
From: United States

"Havent you seen the riots of people demanding jobs because they brought the whole crew of peruvian miners?"

Nobody has a right to a job. You have to earn it.

Written by: DomRat, 6 Feb 2013 4:09 PM
From: Dominican Republic

Very bad idea. Considering revising the 2009 contract with Barrick gold in an effort to raise more money as it faces a major fiscal crisis will precipitate another wave of crises. This is as brilliant as a restaurant with few customers doubling the price of a meal as they are not making enough. The series of new and widely unpopular taxes likely to lead to a 25 percent drop in retail sales, the government raising taxes without making any significant cuts in public spending will not be help either. Addressing why the Dominican Republic ranks last worldwide among 144 nations when it comes to government waste, according to the latest Global Competitiveness Report from the World Economic Forum would be a lot better place to get started.
Written by: RoyStone, 6 Feb 2013 4:40 PM
From: Australia
“Most of the jobs went to people that were from outside the province.”
I wonder why.
Written by: RoyStone, 6 Feb 2013 4:42 PM
From: Australia
We've got foreign loans - don't need foreign investment.
Written by: josean, 6 Feb 2013 4:43 PM
From: United States, Fighting the Dictatorship of the Narco PLD Mafia; Guillermo Moreno President 2016


Either way we always get the short end of the stick!


Written by: generoso, 6 Feb 2013 10:24 PM
From: Dominican Republic, United States
The greedy moguls from Barrick are just using scare tactics, and attempts at bullying, the government should stand strong. This kind of tactics may have worked during the "United Fruit" days, but not now.
First of all Barrick bought the contract rights from another company, and paid off legislators to speed that transfer unquestioned through congress and senate, with a steamroller, without even a blink. This by itself was highly irregular, as well as illegal and conspired against the DR's best interests.
Second of all, there are special conditions that demand a revision, and updating to the present gold prices in the world market. This could be a win-win situation, for Barrick as well as the DR, as if they don't agree to a negotiation, the popular uproar will work as a detriment to more profits, and above all peace and prosperity in the region.
Third, the 5% provision could be clarified to go the a trust, managed by council of local elders, that will dispense the funds wisely.
Written by: josean, 7 Feb 2013 12:35 AM
From: United States, Fighting the Dictatorship of the Narco PLD Mafia; Guillermo Moreno President 2016


As much as Barrick are neocolonial corporate bastards, it takes two to Tango and their Ripoff Partner of the Dominican People was Narco Lie-onel yet people don't want to hold him responsible.


Written by: ohhhvictor, 9 Feb 2013 9:34 AM
From: United States
Written by: RoyStone, 6 Feb 2013 4:42 PM
From: Australia
We've got foreign loans - don't need foreign investmen


NO country in the world, got any prosperity by mining in their soil.
In fact, some of the areas of the South America,with foreign mines are the poorest : las pampas argentinas, la frontera chilena, Bolivia, etc

Foreign investment in the people, factories and service is one thing..
Foreign pillage,pollution of the water and natural resources and looting is a complete different animal!

The situation is simple: If they dont provide any benefits to D.R. ,they can leave right away! We did never call them up, they came on their own as vultures..And they can leave on the same way!

Some people think that we are the same Indians that Columbus find here in 1492!
Written by: ohhhvictor, 9 Feb 2013 9:44 AM
From: United States

"Investors concerned over Barrick revision "

Entonces Colon fue el primer inversionista extranjero que tuvo la republica Dominicana?

:)
Written by: josean, 9 Feb 2013 9:50 AM
From: United States, Fighting the Dictatorship of the Narco PLD Mafia; Guillermo Moreno President 2016


Yet Narco-Lie-onel is still on the side of Barrick Stold!

Written by: RoyStone, 9 Feb 2013 5:18 PM
From: Australia
ohhhvictor,
pronounces
"NO country in the world, got any prosperity by mining in their soil."
He obviously hasn't heard of Australia.
Written by: Tomas, 9 Feb 2013 5:39 PM
From: Dominican Republic, Cabrera
Or Canada!

OK now. Has Barrick actually shipped any gold yet?

The higher price of Gold, silver & copper simply
means Barrick makes more money.
This in turn lets them pay off thier
HUGE expenditures to clean up the mess
my lovely country made trying do do something that they can't.
Which is operate a mine properly.
This is what Canada can do better than anyone else in the world.
Also with the higher prices we get revenue from Barrick sooner.
This is a total win-win situation!
I really hope our polititions can see the simple math here!
For you out there worried about the environment.
Too many watchdogs out here.
A good omelette means a couple of broken eggs.
Small price to pay.
Written by: RoyStone, 9 Feb 2013 6:00 PM
From: Australia
GDP per capita US dollars -
Canada 40,370
Australia 39,721
Duminican Republic 9,796
Post Your Comment | Not a member? Create your account | Lost your password?
Write your opinion here. Please keep your comment relevant to this article. Please note that any comments which contain offensive language or discriminatory expressions may be edited/removed.
You must log in to post a comment:
Username Password