Here's a scoop for the Cubanophiles, Cuban sympathizers:

HAVANA, Cuba, Sept 24 (acn) Cuban First Vice-President Jose Ramon Machado Ventura demanded a new and fairer world order as he addressed the 63 Period of Sessions of the UN General Assembly, in New York.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cuban News Agency



Cuban News Agency





After congratulating Nicaraguan Miguel d’Escoto for having been elected to chair the assembly, Machado Ventura said that today’s world circumstances are crucial for the history of humankind, since the threats currently pending on the planet endanger the existence of the Human Race.


The Cuban First Vice-President said that the only way to secure the future is by promoting peace, solidarity, social justice and sustainable development. The current unfair and unsustainable world order must be replaced with a really democratic and equitable system, he said.


Machado Ventura pointed out that a new world order must be based on respect for international law and the principles of justice and solidarity to put an end to inequalities and the exclusion to which large majorities of the world population have been submitted.


He said that industrialized countries, and particularly the only superpower [the United States] must assume their responsibility in the current situation. It is not possible to keep wasting huge fortunes, while millions of people go hungry and die from curable diseases; neither the peoples of the world nor the planet itself will allow that reality to keep prevailing, without huge social uprisings and very serious natural disasters, Machado stressed.


The top Cuban government official denounced what he described as the most serious threats against peace and international security and he mentioned wars of conquest, aggression and illegal occupation of countries, military intervention and the bombardment of innocent civilians, the arms race, plunder and usurpation of Third World natural resources, and the imperial offensive to submit the resistance of the nations.


Concepts such as “limitation of sovereignty,” “pre-emptive wars” or “regime change” express the intention to mutilate the independence of our countries, he said.


The alleged “war on terror” or the so-called “promotion of liberties” serve as pretexts for aggression and military occupation, torture, arbitrary detention and the denial of the peoples’ free determination, he said.


The Cuban First Vice President denounced the existence of unfair blockades and unilateral sanctions, and he lashed out against the imposition of political, economic and social recipes, which pave the way for imperial domination in open contempt for history, cultures and the sovereign, will of nations.


The Non-Aligned countries are paying the cost of irrationality and speculation by a handful of developed countries of the North, concluded Cuban First Vice-President Jose Ramon Machado Ventura.

Source: http://www.cubanews.ain.cu/2008/0924cubaunassembly.htm

While I may not agree with communism, you can't deny that the cubans do rise a valid point, Arsenio. I guess that, given the venom with which you posted this article, the question for you should be: do you agree with this dog-eat-dog, big-fish-eat-the-little-ones international system, Arsenio?

Furthermore, given the seriousness of the situation, I ask you this (and in spanish, no less): En vez de concentrarnos en la paja en el ojo del comunismo cubano, ¿Por qué no nos concentramos en el hecho de que tenemos como vecino al mayor fracaso en la historia del capitalismo moderno en el hemisferio occidental? Fracaso que, de ser la colonia más asquerosamente rica de Francia, y quizás de la historia del universo (más rica de lo que llegaron a ser la India, las trece colonias de Norteamérica y Jamaica JUNTAS para la Gran Bretaña), ha pasado a ser la sucursal del infierno en la tierra. Si, amigo Arsenio, me estoy refiriendo a nada más y nada menos que al infortunado Haiti (antiguo Saint Domingue), ¿O es que acaso tendrás los timbales para decir que el comunismo cubano tiene más capacidad de afectarnos que la incapacidad de las élites gobernantes haitianas de constuir algo parecido a un país en sus 27,000 kms2 de isla?

Lataro, I agree.

I do however have a question. Why is it when the U.S. does something that other countries dont care for the outcry is "they have to stop". But when they want something changed to benefit them the outcry is"all of you need to change to benefit me". Since the collapse of the Soviet Union even China has adopted capitolist ideas which have made it the hottest economy in Asia, granted the move from pure communisim to Comunistic/dictatorship may not be what the general pouplace of China was looking for however they are better off now than they were before. If Cuba wants things to change for them why can they not change a little themselves?

It seems that there's a general wish for change over there, texas, the only thing preventing it being, as it happened in France during the last days of Louis XIV, everyone is afraid of venting forth their ideas while the old goat remains alive.

LAUTARO:

Hermano,

WHAT VENOM are you referring to? I loathe communism and its proponents; I have since I was a child in Santo Domingo, and Santiago. I left the country for the first time in 1963, and definitely for the second time in 1974; honestly, I don't ever plan to return to live there! I saw the Juan Bosch regime, and what it did to our country; I remember, I was there.
However, that was not the reason for my posting the above article; but, to show a Cuban-proletariat-bureaucrat calling for a "New World Order" before the General Assembly of the United Nations. That was the intent of the post; to show how the so-called socialist call for NWO, just like their pseudo-enemies the capitalists. -------Nothing more, or less....

As for the labels Cubano-philes, and Cuban sympathizers: I'm referring to the whole bunch of people in my native land, and throughout HispanicAmerica that idolize Castro and his demoniacal island farm, and his philosophies; The same Socialist-Communist philophies that have failed in every nation of the world where they were employed, begining in the 1609 A.D. 'with the Jesuit Reductions of Paraguay (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuit_Reductions), until present day Cuba, North Korea, China and Russia (to some extent since they are hybrid systems). I hope those compatriots would one day realize that they've been sold an utopian dream that only exists in the pages of books that bourgoise authors have written with "plenty of capital" from their capitalists illuminati patrons, to deceive the whole world into accepting that philosophy as gospel truth. It's a false religion. As one of its proponents once said: 'religion is the opiate of the peoples'...Yeah, but the Communist belief system is truth? Right? It's a religion of men believing in fallible mortals. "Fight for me I'll set you free", ideology.

Do you agree with this dog-eat-dog, big-fish-eat-the-little-ones international system, Arsenio?

No, but what are my to do? Challenge the world's modus operandi? I didn't invent the Darwinist theories of Evolution & Survival of the fittest? Did you? The men that have preeceded us in history have laid down the rules of engagement. Are we now to topple those rules as individuals?
I'm a pacifist by conviction, and will not resist by arms any form of government that I don't support. When the principles of fight or flight come up; I'll choose flight, rather than to fight. The kingdom that I am of is not of this world; Just like my Savior Jesus Christ didn't resist civil authorities, neither do I.

En vez de concentrarnos en la paja en el ojo del comunismo cubano, ¿Por qué no nos concentramos en el hecho de que tenemos como vecino al mayor fracaso en la historia del capitalismo moderno en el hemisferio occidental?

En ese caso trato de no inmiscuirme mucho porque no se trata de mis hermanos Quisqueyanos quien son mi primera prioridad. Por ese pueblo "primo" (cousin-voisin) solo puedo decirte que nuestro pueblo a tratado arduamente de distanciarze a travez de la histroria, pero al tenerlos contiguo a nuestra patria es imposible. Las luchas armadas para liberarnos de lo azotes del pueblo de la otra costa nos a logrado poco pues la frontera es solo una raya imaginaria; Nadie la respeta; Y hoy en dia con las ideologias del Globalismo (y Liberation Theology) todos los pobres del mundo son instados a que emigren a donde y como le parezca!
El caso de ese pais es uno pauperrimo. La llamada Revolucion fue lo que comenzo el desorden y sistema caotico que predomina alli. Ese hecho empezo a animar a las masas sin recursos a apoderarse de lo ajeno "a la brigandina", , a la franca, a la mala. Turbas de gentes enfurecidas (muchos con razones legitimas) se desplazaban a zaquear, y matar. Hermano, salvo a "los mulatos" (asi le llaman ellos) encargados del gobierno, los sinpatazantes de los mulatos, los Libaneses, y los extranjeros pudientes, el resto del pueblo no tiene en que caerse muerto; Se estan callendo muertos del hambre. Pero, ya tu sabes, "su elite", tiene la culpa. Son asuntos privados.
Si tu tienes tu esposa y tus hijos pasando hambre mientras tienes queridas en Chalet-ces, y parrandeas y mal gastas lo tuyo; No esperaras que tu vecino mantega tu mujer y hijos? Eso es inconvebible! Esto no tiene nada que ver con capitalismo o comunismo, lo que existe en ese pais se llama tirania, o Oligarquia: Donde unos cuantos sabios se apoderan de todos los recursos, y el pueblo vive en sosobra. Nada de capital, y mucho comunismo; Porque todos los pobres tiene en comun su pobreza pauperrima, ni un chele (na' de capital, divisas, cuartos, chavos, etc).
Eso es lo que hay. No capitalismo, no comunismo: se llama "hambrismo", 'to 'pa mi, y 'na 'pa ti! Como dice el refran: "eso no lo cura ni el medico Chino!"

How to get someone else's riches willy-nilly, a.k.a. The New World Order is nothing new it's been the goal of the Illuminati since 1776.

Here're the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto (New World Order) final solution:



10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto

1Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3Abolition of all right of inheritance.

4Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

5Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.

6Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.

7Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

8Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

9Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.

10Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c., &c.[4]

According to the Communist Manifesto, all these were prior conditions for a transition from capitalism to communism (but Marx and Engels later expressed a desire to modernize this passage[5]).

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Communist_Manifesto


This is what these NewWorld Order, Robin (Robbing Hoodlums) Hoods want; Your hard earned wealth for them to distribute it on a per need basis. Then, the one that does the dealing-out becomes a Dictator. Thanks, but, no thanks! Get, your own goods with your own blood, sweat, and tears.

James Brown (Godfather of Soul) had a song a few years ago that said: "I don't need nobody to gimme' nothing, open up the door I'll get it my self". So, why don't they just open up the doors?

Instead of having the haves relinquishing their goods for the greater good?
"I can't go for that".....Darrel Hall & John Oates....."No can do!"

What are your thoughts about the US government's "socialization" of the losses of the Wall Street speculators?

Lautaro says:
What are your thoughts about the US government's "socialization" of the losses of the Wall Street speculators?

*All the political labels: Socialists, Capitalists, Democratic, Conservative, and the like are only used by the Catechumen, neophytes, the uninitiated; The guys that pull the strings have no such restrictions they glide freely from one side of the political spectrum to the other; they're not restrained by petty ideologies, they exist above all philosophical creeds.
The powers that be (the Illuminati) are conducting a full frontal attack on the American economy to collapse its strength and sovereignty. These nefarious organizations can not tolerate the civil, economic, religious, and financial freedoms that the U.S. enjoys. To topple the Economy they must first make it subservient to foreign interests. Many Americans are behind this conspiracy as well, since they aren't solely U.S. citizens, they're also Internationalists and members of a higher organization beyond allegiance to any country. The Rothschilds is one of the banking families who are interested in the disintegration of the U.S. economy. Another body is the E.U., and the Bilderbergs; Also the CFR, Chatham House, the Club of Rome, The Knights of Malta, The Jesuits, Opus Dei, and Free Masonry; Just to name the major players of this scheme. They are all fomenting havoc within the nation, and around the world simultaneously to bring about their "GLOBAL" Utopia.
You may ask what is "their" motivation? The U.S. will not accept being part of a one world government, or The New World Order, unless it's first utterly bankrupt and on its knees; Americans have a long tradition of 'doin' their own thing'. When the total devastation is achieved then the internationalist bankers and elite con-men can offer a life saving plan! One World government - One World Religion is the ultimate goal. Bow to the Beast and you can eat! It will fall, but, will lead the world under a new leader and have a greater scope of influence:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------It will be the head of TheNew World Order..

Be careful when touching the Rothschilds, my friend, cuz' on these "politically correct" times, you could be labeled as "antisemitist" for daring to voice your well researched opinions about those oligarchs. Did you know that Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo allowed them to appropiate themselves of the british economy? How, you'll ask? simple, they had very extensive spy network on the european continent, so efficient that, once they got wind of the allied victory, they misinformed the London stock exchange by telling the stockholders that Napoleon won the battle. After doing so, panic broke out and the main stockholders started selling their shares left and right, and who do you think bought all the shares? yes, my friend, the very oligarchs that we're speaking about. Once the allied victory against the napoleonic forces was made known on british soil, the shares in the stock market skyrocketed and, voila! the Rothschilds found themselves the owners of the economy of the british empire, and their victims could not sue them, because, by the laws of the time, all was made fair and square. The french people were accused of being antisemitist once they dare to expose the Rothschild's scam to the rest of the world. So my advice to you in your dealings with these oligarchs is: thread carefully.