- Page 3 of 3
| #21 - Posted 19 October 2010, 1:14 PM | |
Location: United States, New York City Join date: February 2008 Member #: 411 Posts: 5911  | RE: Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War "their's very few things as dishonorable as seeing such men off to fight futile wars." "They are the only people you mention as dishonerable[sic]." How did you extract that thought from my statement? I clearly stated "their's very few things as dishonorable as seeing such men off to fight futile wars." Another one with reading comprehension. My comment was referring to older men who spent their youth dodging Viet Nam, who started the wars that have wreacked havoc on this country, who have sent honorable men and women off on foreign adventures that were iniitated with lies. That is truly dishonorable and shameful. FYI I have SEVERAL relatives overseas in the armed forces or who have recently returned from duty. How many are serving from your inner circle in these debacles that you support wholeheartedly? "If you're going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill |
Post IP/Country: 161.185.157.2* / US   | |
| Advertisement | |
Sponsored Links | |
| #22 - Posted 19 October 2010, 1:14 PM | |
 Location: United States Join date: July 2009 Member #: 3112 Posts: 786 | RE: Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War Quote: anthonyC previously said: Quote: dreadlocks previously said: Anthonyc reminds...And F.Y.I. I did serve my Country....be careful this time, anthonyc. no flights of fancy, and fantasy. please do not tell us that you were some admiral, or the commander of some elite team in the Gulf. just give us the truth, that you were some civilian clerk attached to the State Department. I have no need, responsibility or desire to tell you how and where I served. It is beyond your minuscule comprehension. would be nice to think AC actually put something before his own self for once(like serving his country for the love of it) but my guess would be he did it to wear the shiny uni and advance himself. not doubting he served well and honorably and doesn't love his country but it does not fit his modus operandus presently. |
Post IP/Country: 174.106.145.24* / US | |
| #23 - Posted 19 October 2010, 1:29 PM | |
Location: United States Join date: June 2008 Member #: 933 Posts: 7982 | RE: Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War Quote: benforpeace previously said: . not doubting he served well and honorably and doesn't love his country but it does not fit his modus operandus presently. That statement doesn't make any sense. Proof of dreadlocks Bigotry. "....... what did Cubans do to deserve preferential treatment?......and treat Black people in the most racist of ways.......... the Cubans are just a bunch of uberracist savages." : I WILL NOT ANSWER ANY POSTS BY THE BIGOT KNOWN AS DREADLOCKS. |
Post IP/Country: 98.254.152.12* / US | |
| #24 - Posted 19 October 2010, 1:30 PM | |
Location: United Kingdom, Dominican Republic Join date: August 2008 Member #: 1307 Posts: 10352 | RE: Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: "their's very few things as dishonorable as seeing such men off to fight futile wars." "They are the only people you mention as dishonerable[sic]." How did you extract that thought from my statement? I clearly stated "their's very few things as dishonorable as seeing such men off to fight futile wars." Another one with reading comprehension. My comment was referring to older men who spent their youth dodging Viet Nam, who started the wars that have wreacked havoc on this country, who have sent honorable men and women off on foreign adventures that were iniitated with lies. That is truly dishonorable and shameful. FYI I have SEVERAL relatives overseas in the armed forces or who have recently returned from duty. How many are serving from your inner circle in these debacles that you support wholeheartedly? Too cryptic for me. I had visions of cheering crowds sending troops off in WW1. S. |
Post IP/Country: 190.80.215.10* / DO | |
- Page 3 of 3
