| #11 - Posted 3 October 2011, 10:47 AM | |
Location: United States Join date: June 2008 Member #: 933 Posts: 7983 | RE: What #OccupyMiami learned from #OccupyBoston learned from #OccupyWallStreet Quote: Occupy Wall Street Protesters Call For Totalitarian Government, Re-Election Of Obama Paul Joseph Watson Sunday, October 2, 2011 UPDATE: Obama Machine Prepares To Hijack ‘Occupy Wall Street’ Despite their honest intentions, many of the Occupy Wall Street protesters are being suckered into a trap and calling for the very “solutions” that are part of the financial elite’s agenda to torpedo the American middle class – higher taxes and more big government. The ignorance displayed in these interviews knows no bounds. The protesters just don’t get it. They are calling for the government to use force to impose their ideas, all in the name of bringing down corporations who they don’t realize have completely bought off government regulators. Corporations and government enjoy a mutually beneficial relationship – getting one to regulate the other is asinine and only hurts smaller businesses who are legitimately trying to compete in a free market economy that barely exists. The zeal for totalitarian government amongst some of the “protesters” is shocking. One sign being carried around read, “A government is an entity which holds the monopolistic right to initiate force,” which seems a little ironic when protesters complain about being physically assaulted by police in the same breath. One woman interviewed by Kokesh also announces her intention to help Obama to capture a second term. How can a self-proclaimed Occupy Wall Street protester simultaneously support the man whose 2008 campaign was bankrolled by Wall Street, whose 2012 campaign is reliant on Wall Street to an even greater extent, and whose cabinet was filled with Wall Street operatives? Something is very wrong with this picture. The usual suspects, mega-rich foundations and elitists, behind the young radicals have also started to emerge – George Soros, The Ruckus Society, the Tides Foundation and the Ford Foundation. “The belated crusade against Wall Street is even more pathetic as it is coordinated by groups who wouldn’t exist without men like Soros, who made their money from deals that make the Street look sparkling clean. It’s class warfare as a cynical jab at the populist center, the people who mutter to themselves that the Street is full of crooks and so is Congress,” writes Daniel Greenfield. The thousands of Americans currently expressing their disgust at Wall Street and the bankers who have ruined the economy to the detriment of the poor and middle class should be commended for getting off their hind ends and doing something, unlike the millions who will continue to watch American Idol, drink beer and laugh in ignorance as the country is flushed down the toilet. It should also be added that there is a sprinkling of “End the Fed” demonstrators who truly understand the root cause of the problem. However, the fact that the majority of the Occupy Wall Street demonstrators are advocating “solutions” which the very elite they claim to be protesting against also want should set alarm bells ringing. The official Occupy Wall Street website vehemently supports Obama’s tax agenda, again in the deluded belief that Obama, the ultimate Wall Street puppet, genuinely wants to go after big corporations who use loopholes to avoid paying income tax. In calling for higher taxes on the middle class, the protesters are mimicking the likes of billionaire Warren Buffet. The top corporations pay virtually zero income tax because of loopholes that they have crafted in league with bought off government regulators. Obama’s tax hikes will only impact genuine middle class businesses and middle class Americans earning over $200,000 – with the rate of inflation as it is this can hardly be described as the “super rich”. As Anthony Wile writes, the protesters are being completely misdirected by their socialist/communist leaders. The real center of financial control is the Federal Reserve and the city of London, and yet ideologue Michael Moore said earlier this week that “ending capitalism” was more important than dealing with the Fed. Wile notes that the protesters seem obsessed with those who conduct financial transactions, not those who actually run global central banks, the real string pullers. “To get at the root of the problem, one should be protesting, say, in London’s City where central banking originated. Or protesting in front of the Federal Reserve in Washington DC. These are real seats of power. But the shadowy and excessively powerful and wealthy individuals who have created the modern economic system are quite satisfied no doubt to have Wall Street take the blame. It suits their purposes,” writes Wile. “It is too bad that the Occupy Wall Street movement seems to be obscuring the larger issues by apparently blaming the private (transactional) sector in entirety for what has occurred in the past few years.” Edited on 10/3/2011 10:48 AM by anthonyC. Proof of dreadlocks Bigotry. "....... what did Cubans do to deserve preferential treatment?......and treat Black people in the most racist of ways.......... the Cubans are just a bunch of uberracist savages." : I WILL NOT ANSWER ANY POSTS BY THE BIGOT KNOWN AS DREADLOCKS. |
Post IP/Country: 98.254.152.12* / US | |
| Advertisement | |
Sponsored Links | |
| #12 - Posted 3 October 2011, 1:42 PM | |
Location: United States Join date: December 2007 Member #: 4 Posts: 17814 | RE: What #OccupyMiami learned from #OccupyBoston learned from #OccupyWallStreet anthonyc, thanks for posting that article. i agree with it, wholeheartedly |
Post IP: 181.36.127.5* | |
| #13 - Posted 3 October 2011, 1:55 PM | |
Location: United Kingdom, Dominican Republic Join date: August 2008 Member #: 1307 Posts: 10352 | RE: What #OccupyMiami learned from #OccupyBoston learned from #OccupyWallStreet Quote: dreadlocks previously said: anthonyc, thanks for posting that article. i agree with it, wholeheartedly Once people are unsettled they alight on ideas right and wrong. Yes there are capitalist devils out there: but also angels that are leading humanity in the right direction. S. |
Post IP/Country: 190.80.204.9* / DO | |
| #14 - Posted 3 October 2011, 2:31 PM | |
Location: United States, In the place to be Join date: August 2010 Member #: 5620 Posts: 1137 | Wall Street protests continue and grow across the country By Karen Matthews, Associated Press Updated 20m ago NEW YORK – Protesters speaking out against corporate greed and other issues showed no signs of giving up their campaign on Monday, with organizers urging participants to dress up as corporate zombies and to take part in a rally against police brutality. The arrests of 700 people on Brooklyn Bridge over the weekend fueled the anger of the protesters camping in a Manhattan park and sparked support elsewhere in the country as the campaign entered its third week. Occupy Wall Street started with fewer than a dozen college students spending days and nights in Zuccotti Park, a plaza near the city's financial center. But a day after Saturday's mass arrests, hundreds of protesters were resolute and like-minded groups in other cities had joined in. Group spokesman Patrick Bruner urged protesters on Monday to dress up as corporate zombies and eat Monopoly money to let financial workers "see us reflecting the metaphor of their actions." As the encampment slowly began waking up Monday morning, several dozen police officers stood in formation across the street. One camper set up a table with tubes of makeup and stacks of fake money and was applying white makeup to the face of a young woman. John Hildebrand, 24, an unemployed teacher from Norman, Oklahoma, sat up in his sleeping bag around 10 a.m. He said he arrived Saturday after getting a cheap plane ticket to New York. "My issue is corporate influence in politics," he said. "I would like to eliminate corporate financing from politics." He said was returning home on Tuesday and planned to organize a similar protest there. One supporter, William Stack, sent an email to city officials urging that all charges be dropped against those arrested. "It is not a crime to demand that our money be spent on meeting people's needs, not for massive corporate bailouts," he wrote. "The real criminals are in the boardrooms and executive offices on Wall Street, not the people marching for jobs, health care, and a moratorium on foreclosures." Police said the department will continue its regular patrols of the area. And "as always, if it is a lawful demonstration, we help facilitate and if they break the law we arrest them," NYPD spokesman Paul Browne said. Wiljago Cook, 33, of Oakland, California, who joined the protest on the first day, said "exposing police brutality wasn't even really on my agenda but my eyes have been opened." She and her boyfriend and two neighbors all quit their jobs to come and planned "to stay as long as it seems useful," said Cook, who had worked for a nonprofit theater group. She was wearing zombie makeup that included a red streak down her forehead. "It's a cheeky and fun way to make the same point that we've been making," Cook said of her painted face. A map of the country displayed on the plaza identified 21 places where other protests were organized. Wall-Street style demonstrations with names like Occupy Los Angeles, Occupy Chicago, and Occupy Boston were staged in front of Federal Reserve buildings in those cities. A group in Columbus, Ohio, also marched on the capital city's street. And signs of support were rearing up outside the U.S. In Canada, a Wall Street rally is planned for later this month in Toronto. "It was chaos here" two weeks ago, said Jackie Fellner, a marketing manager from Westchester County, north of the city. Campers take turns organizing a "general assembly" on the plaza where they divide tasks among themselves. They have "a protocol for most things," said 19-year-old Kira Moyer-Sims of Portland, Oregon, including a makeshift hospital and getting legal help for people who are arrested. They rally around a website called OccupyWallSt.org, and they even started printing a newspaper — the Occupied Wall Street Journal. The campers also have been fueled by encouraging words from well-known figures, the latest actor Alec Baldwin, who posted videos on his Twitter page that had already been widely circulated. One appeared to show police using pepper spray on a group of women, another a young man being tackled to the ground by an officer. "This is unsettling," Baldwin wrote. "I think the NYPD has a PR problem." Fellner said she has an issue with "big money dictating which politicians get elected and what programs get funded." But "we're not here to take down Wall Street," she insisted. "It's not poor against rich." Still, the protesters chose Wall Street as their physical rallying point, speaking against corporate greed, social inequality, global climate change and other concerns. Beside the mass arrest Saturday, police arrested about 100 people Sept. 24 when protesters marched to other parts of the city and got into a tense standoff with officers. Some said protesters on the Brooklyn Bridge were lured onto the roadway by police, or they didn't hear the calls from authorities to head to the pedestrian walkway. Police said no one was tricked into being arrested, and that those in the back of the group who couldn't hear were allowed to leave. The NYPD released video footage Sunday to back up its stance. In one of the videos, an official uses a bullhorn to warn the crowd. Marchers can be seen chanting, "Take the bridge." Source: http://www.usatoday.com/money/markets/story/2011-10-03/wall-street-protesters-zombies/50642978/1 ![]() ![]() |
Post IP/Country: 71.55.242.13* / US | |
| #15 - Posted 4 October 2011, 8:26 AM | |
Location: United States Join date: June 2008 Member #: 933 Posts: 7983 | RE: What #OccupyMiami learned from #OccupyBoston learned from #OccupyWallStreet Holy Easily Manipulated Liberals Batman!!! [QUOTE]Occupy Wall Street' Organizer Is Marketing Analyst Whose LinkedIn Lists Work For Investment Bankers By Mark Finkelstein | October 03, 2011 | 22:41 Trust him--he might be young, but he's a "professional sociologist." So did Harrison Schultz, an organizer of the "Occupy Wall Street" protests, describe himself to Al Sharpton on MSNBC this evening. And he wants Al and us to know that "a lot of the people that are here are in fact anarchists, are in fact revolutionaries. . . . We don't really want to fix [the problems]. It's revolution, not reform." There are also some amusing factoids about Harrison. When he's not out fomenting revolution, Schultz is an . . . analyst for a marketing firm. Oh yeah, and in his oh-so-bourgeois LinkedIn profile, Harrison wants people to know he worked at Bank of America providing "assistance for several investment bankers." Oh, the horror! Video after the jump. Keep hope alive, Harrison! Remember, not too long ago another young radical described his time in the private sector as having worked "behind enemy lines"--and went on to become President of the United States! AL SHARPTON: Joining me now from lower Manhattan near Wall Street is Harrison Schultz, one of the organizers of Occupy Wall Street. Harrison, thank you for coming on the show. HARRISON SCHULTZ: Thank you for having me, Reverend: happy birthday! SHARPTON: Thank you. Tell us a little bit about the movement that's going on in Wall Street. SCHULTZ: The movement down here is incredibly exciting. It's incredibly exhilirating. And I see my opinion as a professional sociologist, I think that this is the beginning of a revolution in this country . . . We're all for change. We all want something different. We all want something better. As far as the specifics, as far as how we go about doing that, we don't know yet. Part of the problem, part of the issue is that I think that a lot of the people that are here are in fact anarchists, are in fact revolutionaries. And putting a revolution, putting a revolutionary change into political terms is very difficult to do. Because we're trying to get away from all the problems. Again, we don't really want to fix them: it's revolution, not reform. It's fashionable among liberals to cast Occupy Wall Street as the left's version of the Tea Party. Take this piece by Michael Scherer at "Time," for example: Occupy Wall Street: A Tea Party for the Left? Scherer claims that "there is great potential for (Occupy Wall Street) spreading further," and that the movement has "huge potential." You go, Harrison and Michael! The Republican party largely embraced the Tea Party. It led to historic victories in 2010, and has positioned the GOP to take back the White House in 2012. Were the Democrats to similarly embrace Occupy Wall Street, with its self-described band of "anarachists and revolutionaries" who "don't really want to fix the problems," the Dems could be looking at an historic defeat next year.[/QUOTE] Edited on 10/4/2011 8:27 AM by anthonyC. Proof of dreadlocks Bigotry. "....... what did Cubans do to deserve preferential treatment?......and treat Black people in the most racist of ways.......... the Cubans are just a bunch of uberracist savages." : I WILL NOT ANSWER ANY POSTS BY THE BIGOT KNOWN AS DREADLOCKS. |
Post IP/Country: 98.254.152.12* / US | |
| #16 - Posted 4 October 2011, 8:29 AM | |
Location: United States Join date: June 2008 Member #: 933 Posts: 7983 | RE: What #OccupyMiami learned from #OccupyBoston learned from #OccupyWallStreet Quote: Wall Street Protesters Brewing Tea Party of the Left? Not Yet, Strategists Say By Judson Berger Published October 03, 2011 Protesters who've gathered under the banner of "Occupy Wall Street" are looking to light a movement, but as hundreds of demonstrators rally against corporate "greed and corruption," they have a long way to go before becoming a defined cause like the Tea Party, say political analysts. That's not to say they aren't trying. In three-weeks time, the Occupy Wall Street crowd has attracted high-profile attention. It has the purported backing of unions like the Teamsters and DC-37, New York City's largest public employees union. It has attracted Hollywood types who love a good cause to drop in on; and has even generated a discussion group at a convention of liberal leaders taking place in Washington, D.C., this week. But the movement has at least one major obstacle to becoming a political force -- the administration it would protest is on its side. "I would simply say that to the extent that people are frustrated with the economic situation, we understand. And that's why we're so urgently focused -- trying to focus Congress's attention on the need to take action on the economy and job creation," White House spokesman Jay Carney said Monday, responding to a question about where President Obama's sympathy lies. David Avella, president of Republican recruiter GOPAC, said protesters on the left today lack the "common enemy" they tagged during the George W. Bush administration. And despite frequent clashes with Republicans, the White House has passed several major pieces of legislation that progressives liked -- even if they weren't as sweeping as initially envisioned. In 2006 and 2008 when Democrats took control of power in Congress and the administration, "it was much easier for the progressives to rally like-minded individuals who wanted to ... defeat the Bush agenda," Avella said. In response to progressive successes after the elections, the Tea Party movement evolved in 2009 to become perhaps a once-in-a-generation force. Motivated by a confluence of factors it was primarily fueled by anger at "crony capitalism" and too-big-to-fail policies that propped up the financial industry. Since then, individual Tea Party groups have evolved into a mature national network with a variety of priorities and platforms, but its collective anger and untiring commitment are still simmering -- the result of few changes in Washington's overall behavior. Similarly, the Occupy Wall Street set is also fighting crony capitalism and too-big-to-fail policies that propped up the financial industry. The difference, however, may be in their demands. Tea Partiers want Washington to lay off and let the free-market system self-correct. Occupy Wall Street -- at least, according to some at the protests -- is looking to engineer an overthrow of the free-market system. The protesters are "trying to accomplish the demolition of capitalism," one demonstrator told Fox News. Another said the group wants to replace capitalism with a different economic model. Summed up on the Occupy Wall Street website as an Arab Spring-inspired protest against corporate greed, protesters have also flailed against student loans, global warming and even the Tea Party-favorite Federal Reserve. "I just don't see how it goes anywhere," said Sal Russo, strategist with the Tea Party Express, suggesting the demonstrations have too much of a "Marxist" appeal. "Most Americans understand that to have an employee, you have to have an employer," Russo said. The sustained frustration among the Occupy Wall Streeters has given rise to greater visibility. What started in New York City has spread to dozens of other cities, including Denver, Albuquerque, Chicago, San Francisco and Boston. The other locations don't necessarily carry the intensity of the 700 protesters arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge over the weekend in New York, at least not yet. According to one local report, a protest in St. Louis comprised less than a dozen people outside a Federal Reserve Bank. But Democratic strategist Dan Gerstein said the potential is there for "a huge opening for a populist alternative" to the Tea Party. "I don't think it's there yet, but there is tremendous potential," said Gerstein, who noted that Occupy Wall Street needs a sponsor. "They're missing money, like the Koch brothers and FreedomWorks" who helped back the rise of the Tea Parties, Gerstein said. "They need someone like a Ross Perot who can just say, 'We're mad as hell and not gonna take it.'" Aside from message and sponsorship, Occupy Wall Street has other hurdles that the Tea Party has already demonstrated to be potential liabilities. If the protests become too disruptive they could turn off independents. And it remains to be seen whether the protests will alienate the group into the fringe, leaving Obama looking like a moderate and pushing him toward compromise with the GOP, or whether the president will use the outcry to better position himself as a defender of the middle class -- something he's tried to do recently while rallying his base constituencies. "There's still an opportunity for him to take leadership here," Gerstein said. Proof of dreadlocks Bigotry. "....... what did Cubans do to deserve preferential treatment?......and treat Black people in the most racist of ways.......... the Cubans are just a bunch of uberracist savages." : I WILL NOT ANSWER ANY POSTS BY THE BIGOT KNOWN AS DREADLOCKS. |
Post IP/Country: 98.254.152.12* / US | |
| #17 - Posted 4 October 2011, 11:21 AM | |
Location: United States, In the place to be Join date: August 2010 Member #: 5620 Posts: 1137 | Protests against Wall Street spread across U.S. By CHRIS HAWLEY, Associated Press NEW YORK – Protests against Wall Street entered their 18th day Tuesday as demonstrators across the country show their anger over the wobbly economy and what they see as corporate greed by marching on Federal Reserve banks and camping out in parks from Los Angeles to Portland, Maine. (picture) By Charles Rex Arbogast, AP Protesters gather on the corner of LaSalle and Jackson during an "Occupy Chicago" protest Monday, Oct. 3, 2011, in Chicago. Demonstrations are expected to continue throughout the week as more groups hold organizational meetings and air their concerns on websites and through streaming video. In Manhattan on Monday, hundreds of protesters dressed as corporate zombies in white face paint lurched past the New York Stock Exchange clutching fistfuls of fake money. In Chicago, demonstrators pounded drums in the city's financial district. Others pitched tents or waved protest signs at passing cars in Boston, St. Louis, Kansas City, Mo., and Los Angeles. A slice of America's discontented, from college students worried about their job prospects to middle-age workers who have been recently laid off, were galvanized after the arrests of 700 protesters on the Brooklyn Bridge over the weekend. Some protesters likened themselves to the tea party movement — but with a liberal bent — or to the Arab Spring demonstrators who brought down their rulers in the Middle East. "We feel the power in Washington has actually been compromised by Wall Street," said Jason Counts, a computer systems analyst and one of about three dozen protesters in St. Louis. "We want a voice, and our voice has slowly been degraded over time." The Occupy Wall Street protests started on Sept. 17 with a few dozen demonstrators who tried to pitch tents in front of the New York Stock Exchange. Since then, hundreds have set up camp in a park nearby and have become increasingly organized, lining up medical aid and legal help and printing their own newspaper, the Occupied Wall Street Journal. About 100 demonstrators were arrested on Sept. 24 and some were pepper-sprayed. On Saturday police arrested 700 on charges of disorderly conduct and blocking a public street as they tried to march over the Brooklyn Bridge. Police said they took five more protesters into custody on Monday, though it was unclear whether they had been charged with any crime. "At this point, we don't anticipate wider unrest," said Tim Flannelly, an FBI spokesman in New York, "but should it occur the city, including the NYPD and the FBI, will deploy any and all resources necessary to control any developments." Flannelly said he does not expect the New York protests to develop into the often-violent demonstrations that have rocked cities in the United Kingdom since the summer. But he said the FBI is "monitoring the situation and will respond accordingly." Wiljago Cook, of Oakland, Calif., who joined the New York protest on the first day, said she was shocked by the arrests. "Exposing police brutality wasn't even really on my agenda, but my eyes have been opened," she said. She vowed to stay in New York "as long as it seems useful." City bus drivers sued the New York Police Department on Monday for commandeering their buses and making them drive to the Brooklyn Bridge on Saturday to pick up detained protesters. "We're down with these protesters. We support the notion that rich folk are not paying their fair share," said Transport Workers Union President John Samuelsen. "Our bus operators are not going to be pressed into service to arrest protesters anywhere." The city's Law Department said the NYPD's actions were proper. On Monday, the zombies stayed on the sidewalks as they wound through Manhattan's financial district chanting, "How to fix the deficit: End the war, tax the rich!" They lurched along with their arms in front of them. Some yelled, "I smell money!" Reaction was mixed from passers-by. Roland Klingman, who works in the financial industry and was wearing a suit as he walked through a raucous crowd of protesters, said he could sympathize with the anti-Wall Street message. "I don't think it's directed personally at everyone who works down here," Klingman said. "If they believe everyone down here contributes to policy decisions, it's a serious misunderstanding." Another man in a suit yelled at the protesters, "Go back to work!" He declined to be interviewed. Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a billionaire who made his fortune as a corporate executive, has said the demonstrators are making a mistake by targeting Wall Street. "The protesters are protesting against people who make $40- or $50,000 a year and are struggling to make ends meet. That's the bottom line. Those are the people who work on Wall Street or in the finance sector," Bloomberg said in a radio interview Friday. Some protesters planned to travel to other cities to organize similar events. John Hildebrand, a protester in New York from Norman, Okla., hoped to mount a protest there after returning home Tuesday. Julie Levine, a protester in Los Angeles, planned to go to Washington on Thursday. Websites and Facebook pages with names like Occupy Boston and Occupy Philadelphia have also sprung up to plan the demonstrations. Hundreds of demonstrators marched from a tent city on a grassy plot in downtown Boston to the Statehouse to call for an end of corporate influence of government. "Our beautiful system of American checks and balances has been thoroughly trashed by the influence of banks and big finance that have made it impossible for the people to speak," said protester Marisa Engerstrom, of Somerville, Mass., a Harvard doctoral student. The Boston demonstrators decorated their tents with hand-written signs reading, "Fight the rich, not their wars" and "Human need, not corporate greed." Some stood on the sidewalk holding up signs, engaging in debate with passers-by and waving at honking cars. One man yelled "Go home!" from his truck. Another man made an obscene gesture. Patrick Putnam, a 27-year-old chef from Framingham, Mass., said he's standing up for the 99% of Americans who have no say in what happens in government. "We don't have voices, we don't have lobbyists, so we've been pretty much neglected by Washington," he said. In Chicago, protesters beat drums on the corner near the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. In Los Angeles, demonstrators hoping to get TV coverage gathered in front of the courthouse where Michael Jackson's doctor is on trial on manslaughter charges. Protesters in St. Louis stood on a street corner a few blocks from the shimmering Gateway Arch, carrying signs that read, "How Did The Cat Get So Fat?," "You're a Pawn in Their Game" and "We Want The Sacks Of Gold Goldman Sachs Stole From Us." "Money talks, and it seems like money has all the power," said Apollonia Childs. "I don't want to see any homeless people on the streets, and I don't want to see a veteran or elderly people struggle. We all should have our fair share. We all vote, pay taxes. Tax the rich." ——— Verena Dobnik, Karen Matthews, Cristian Salazar and Jennifer Peltz in New York; Jim Suhr in St. Louis; David Sharp in Portland, Maine; Mark Pratt in Boston; Patrick Walters in Philadelphia; Pete Yost in Washington; Bill Draper in Kansas City, Mo.; Carla K. Johnson in Chicago, and Christina Hoag and Robert Jablon in Los Angeles contributed to this report. Source: http://www.usatoday.com/money/markets/story/2011-10-04/wall-street-protests/50654534/1 ![]() ![]() |
Post IP/Country: 71.55.246.16* / US | |
| #18 - Posted 4 October 2011, 12:14 PM | |
Location: United States Join date: December 2007 Member #: 4 Posts: 17814 | RE: #OccupyWallStreet trust me on this one, anthonyc. Obama is not going to be driven out of office next election. the people have seen through the Tea Party for what it is...the last , dying gasp of the angry white man, trying to reinstitute the Confederacy. they, and their fellow travellers, such as self loathing Latinos from South Florida, are in for a rude awakening, come next election. the rubber is beginning to meet the road, and, now that white people are beginning to feel the pinch, the republican mantra will be even less attractive. it is no different than Vietnam. when the only people going to war were the blacks ,the hispanics,and illiterate white hicks from the Ozarks, war was good. when the draft came, and nice , clean boys from Vermont were being blown to bits, you began to see Kent State, and the entire anti'war movement. same thing this time. it is no longer a world in which white people lash out against people from Detroit on food stamps. white folks have lost their beloved McMansions, and their kids owe Dartmouth 30 large, but have no jobs with which to meet the note. Obama did not cause that, and they are intelligent enough to recognise that fact. sorry, anthonyc, but the numbers do not add up. a few shrill voices on talk radio will not change that. Edited on 10/4/2011 12:15 PM by dreadlocks. |
Post IP/Country: 190.166.35.25* / DO | |
| #19 - Posted 4 October 2011, 1:52 PM | |
Location: United States, In the place to be Join date: August 2010 Member #: 5620 Posts: 1137 | Who’s really behind Wall Street protests? Radicals foment agitation in New York, while hinting at American ‘Arab Spring’. Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:57 PM EST ![]() By Aaron Klein As the news media struggles to find a unifying theme behind the so-called Wall Street protesters, a closer look at the activists behind the agitation reveals a trans formative agenda aimed at assaulting U.S. capitalism. The NY Times on Friday featured a video depicting the motivation of the so-called Wall Street protesters without disclosing the radical background of some of those featured in the newspaper’s piece. The video was entitled, “The young and old on what they hope to accomplish by joining the Occupy Wall Street demonstration in Zuccotti Park.” One activist interviewed was Bev Rice, who has been sending on line updates of the protests to the War Resisters League, where she has been an activist. The League was one of the first radical groups to blame America for the 9-11 attacks. On the very day of the 9-11 attacks, WRL released a statement alleging, “The policies of militarism pursued by the United States have resulted in millions of deaths. …(M)ay these profound tragedies (of 9/11} remind us of the impact U.S. policies have had on other civilians in other lands.” Another activist interviewed by the NY Times was holding a placard that quoted John F. Kennedy stating, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.” Yet another was donning a red Kafiya, or Arabic headscarf with a specific pattern that has come to symbolize so-called Palestinian “resistance” against Israel. That style of Kafiya was popularized by Yasser Arafat. The Occupy Wall Street movement launched two weeks ago and has been escalating ever since. Yesterday, police closed the Brooklyn Bridge and arrested more than 700 anti-Wall Street protesters for blocking traffic lanes and attempting an unauthorized march across the span. The protests reportedly spread across the U.S., including to Boston, Seattle and Los Angeles. The organizers exact motivation has until now been sketchy. The Twitter feed of a group calling itself Take the Square, one of the social media planners behind the Wall Street protests, has been blasting a multitude of messages, including: Fight “market dictatorship” “People of the world rise up!” “We are legion.+ “Take to the streets.” Organizers have also been calling for rewriting the U.S. Constitution; imposing a “Robin Hood tax” on most financial transactions worldwide with the goal of taking from the “rich” to give to the “poor;” and giving the Federal Reserve permission to regulate interest rates on savings accounts. The scheme seeks to bring to American streets the “same indignation that has prompted the people of Greece and Spain to occupy streets and squares on a permanent basis, the people of Egypt and Tunisia to overthrow their governments, the people of Iceland to nationalize their bank system and rewrite the constitution.” So reads a call to arms by a group calling itself the General Assembly of New York City. The group has been asking supporters to participate in a “Day of Rage” that started last month and seeks to escalate into protests across the nation. The General Assembly of New York City has listed some of the possible goals of the current protests: *The imposition of a Robin Hood Tax on all financial transactions. That tax is the brainchild of nongovernmental organizations largely based in the UK. It calls for a new tax on most goods and services to be implemented globally, regionally or unilaterally by individual nations. The name of the tax originated in 2008, when Italian treasury minister Giulio Tremonti introduced a windfall tax on the profits of energy companies. Tremonti called the tax a “Robin Hood Tax,” stating it was aimed at the “wealthy” with revenue to be used for the benefit of poorer citizens. A prominent supporter of the Robin Hood Tax is Jeffrey Sachs, a Columbia University economist who crafted a controversial economic “shock therapy.” Sachs is a key member of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, or INET. Billionaire George Soros is INET’s founding sponsor, with the billionaire having provided a reported $25 million over five years to support INET activities. This past April, Sachs keynoted INET’s annual meeting, which took place in the mountains of Bretton Woods, N.H. The gathering took place at Mount Washington Hotel, famous for hosting the original Bretton Woods economic agreements drafted in 1944. That conference’s goal was to rebuild a post-World War II international monetary system. The April gathering had a similar stated goal – a global economic restructuring. *Rebooting the system, and rewriting the Constitution. The concept seems to be a reference to a plan to push for a new, “progressive” U.S. Constitution by the year 2020. KleinOnline previously reported at least three White House advisers and officials, including President Obama’s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, have ties to the Constitution rewrite effort, which is funded by Soros. Sunstein has also been pushing for a new socialist-style U.S. bill of rights that, among other things, would constitutionally require the government to offer each citizen a “useful” job in the farms or industries of the nation. According to Sunstein’s new bill of rights, the U.S. government can also intercede to ensure every farmer can sell his product for a good return while the government is granted power to act against “unfair competition” and monopolies in business. Reinstatement of the Glass-Steagall Act, which sought to enforce more government regulation of the banking industry. Some provisions of the act allowed the Federal Reserve to regulate interest rates in savings accounts. Read more: http://kleinonline.wnd.com/2011/10/02/wall-street-agitators-target-u-s-capitalism-brooklyn-bridge-shut-down-radicals-training-for-confrontation/ +Legion: And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion for we are many. --Mark 5:9 ![]() ![]() |
Post IP/Country: 71.55.246.16* / US | |
| #20 - Posted 4 October 2011, 1:59 PM | |
Location: United States Join date: June 2008 Member #: 933 Posts: 7983 | RE: #OccupyWallStreet Quote: dreadlocks previously said: trust me on this one, anthonyc. Obama is not going to be driven out of office next election. the people have seen through the Tea Party for what it is...the last , dying gasp of the angry white man, trying to reinstitute the Confederacy. they, and their fellow travellers, such as self loathing Latinos from South Florida, are in for a rude awakening, come next election. the rubber is beginning to meet the road, and, now that white people are beginning to feel the pinch, the republican mantra will be even less attractive. it is no different than Vietnam. when the only people going to war were the blacks ,the hispanics,and illiterate white hicks from the Ozarks, war was good. when the draft came, and nice , clean boys from Vermont were being blown to bits, you began to see Kent State, and the entire anti'war movement. same thing this time. it is no longer a world in which white people lash out against people from Detroit on food stamps. white folks have lost their beloved McMansions, and their kids owe Dartmouth 30 large, but have no jobs with which to meet the note. Obama did not cause that, and they are intelligent enough to recognise that fact. sorry, anthonyc, but the numbers do not add up. a few shrill voices on talk radio will not change that. Dream on! Face it Its over except for the vote counting. Proof of dreadlocks Bigotry. "....... what did Cubans do to deserve preferential treatment?......and treat Black people in the most racist of ways.......... the Cubans are just a bunch of uberracist savages." : I WILL NOT ANSWER ANY POSTS BY THE BIGOT KNOWN AS DREADLOCKS. |
Post IP/Country: 98.254.152.12* / US | |


