| #21 - Posted 22 September 2009, 9:16 AM | |
Location: Dominican Republic, Cabrera and Sosua a 2 days a month for payday Join date: December 2007 Member #: 36 Posts: 1275 | RE: US might have been involved in 2002 Chavez coup: Carter Quote: texasshoe previously said: HiHater said; "About Venezuela, you should care because they are neighbors and fellow latinos, but to each his own. I think hugo had it right at first, the US was heavily indebting the country as owned most of their resources (no surpirse there). Yet he definitely went overboard, too radical and idiotic at times yet at times the US does need a good counter balance and when that counter is from your third largest supplier of oil it gives you some certain leverage. Venezuela is a regional player like it or not." That is not true about the resources. Under president Perez they (Venezuela) had an opening of the oil sector in which international companies could participate in the infrastructure of the energy sector. 4 large projects were built on the northeast coast of Venezuela in the Cryogenic Complex outside of Barcelona. The highest percentage of ownership by a foriegn company was 50% which was at the Petrozuata upgrader, the partnership was Conoco and PDVSA, the next one built was SINCOR and that was 37% by Total, 37% PDVSAand 26% Statoil, the third and fourth were constructed during the same time period, Hamaca and Cerro Negro. Hamaca was Exxon, PDVSA, Cerro Negro was Mobil, PDVSA and Veba. What the international companies owned was the technology in the facilities and payments from the government (PDVSA) were made in the form of semi-refined products to the oil companies for the investments in the facilities. Almost all of the upgraders cost in excess of 3 1/2 billion US. If you look at the companies involved, Conoco and ExxonMobil are the only US companies involved. Total is French, Statoil is from Norway and Veba is German. The largest support company to PDVSA in the country was Schlumberger which is also French. Even during the opening of the energy sector PDVSA maintained ownership of the crude reserves but foriegn companies were allowed to invest and recieve payments in products. From 1999 until 2005 I worked in the Crigenic Complex at Petrozuata and SINCOR. The vast gold reserves are located in the State of Bolivar at Las Cristinas mine and it has not been exploited in a number of years and the last company that won the concession and had it revoked recently was Crystalex a Canadian company. I guess what I am getting to is there is, or was, a very large international presence in Venezuela but non-US companies made up the bulk of the investments. I remember a lot of the Puedo intellectuals saying we went into Afganistan and Iraq for the money Things people will say will never cease to amaze me. |
Post IP/Country: 201.229.245.* / DO | |
| Advertisement | |
Sponsored Links | |
| #22 - Posted 22 September 2009, 9:24 AM | |
Location: Dominican Republic, Cabrera and Sosua a 2 days a month for payday Join date: December 2007 Member #: 36 Posts: 1275 | RE: US might have been involved in 2002 Chavez coup: Carter Quote: texasshoe previously said: HiHater said; "About Venezuela, you should care because they are neighbors and fellow latinos, but to each his own. I think hugo had it right at first, the US was heavily indebting the country as owned most of their resources (no surpirse there). Yet he definitely went overboard, too radical and idiotic at times yet at times the US does need a good counter balance and when that counter is from your third largest supplier of oil it gives you some certain leverage. Venezuela is a regional player like it or not." That is not true about the resources. Under president Perez they (Venezuela) had an opening of the oil sector in which international companies could participate in the infrastructure of the energy sector. 4 large projects were built on the northeast coast of Venezuela in the Cryogenic Complex outside of Barcelona. The highest percentage of ownership by a foriegn company was 50% which was at the Petrozuata upgrader, the partnership was Conoco and PDVSA, the next one built was SINCOR and that was 37% by Total, 37% PDVSAand 26% Statoil, the third and fourth were constructed during the same time period, Hamaca and Cerro Negro. Hamaca was Exxon, PDVSA, Cerro Negro was Mobil, PDVSA and Veba. What the international companies owned was the technology in the facilities and payments from the government (PDVSA) were made in the form of semi-refined products to the oil companies for the investments in the facilities. Almost all of the upgraders cost in excess of 3 1/2 billion US. If you look at the companies involved, Conoco and ExxonMobil are the only US companies involved. Total is French, Statoil is from Norway and Veba is German. The largest support company to PDVSA in the country was Schlumberger which is also French. Even during the opening of the energy sector PDVSA maintained ownership of the crude reserves but foriegn companies were allowed to invest and recieve payments in products. From 1999 until 2005 I worked in the Crigenic Complex at Petrozuata and SINCOR. The vast gold reserves are located in the State of Bolivar at Las Cristinas mine and it has not been exploited in a number of years and the last company that won the concession and had it revoked recently was Crystalex a Canadian company. I guess what I am getting to is there is, or was, a very large international presence in Venezuela but non-US companies made up the bulk of the investments. I remember a lot of the Psuedo intellectuals saying we went into Afganistan and Iraq for the money Things people will say will never cease to amaze me. |
Post IP/Country: 201.229.245.* / DO | |
| #23 - Posted 23 September 2009, 6:51 PM | |
Location: United States, Brooklyn, NY Join date: August 2009 Member #: 3511 Posts: 245 | RE: US might have been involved in 2002 Chavez coup: Carter Quote: texasshoe previously said: HiHater said; "About Venezuela, you should care because they are neighbors and fellow latinos, but to each his own. I think hugo had it right at first, the US was heavily indebting the country as owned most of their resources (no surpirse there). Yet he definitely went overboard, too radical and idiotic at times yet at times the US does need a good counter balance and when that counter is from your third largest supplier of oil it gives you some certain leverage. Venezuela is a regional player like it or not." That is not true about the resources. Under president Perez they (Venezuela) had an opening of the oil sector in which international companies could participate in the infrastructure of the energy sector. 4 large projects were built on the northeast coast of Venezuela in the Cryogenic Complex outside of Barcelona. The highest percentage of ownership by a foriegn company was 50% which was at the Petrozuata upgrader, the partnership was Conoco and PDVSA, the next one built was SINCOR and that was 37% by Total, 37% PDVSAand 26% Statoil, the third and fourth were constructed during the same time period, Hamaca and Cerro Negro. Hamaca was Exxon, PDVSA, Cerro Negro was Mobil, PDVSA and Veba. What the international companies owned was the technology in the facilities and payments from the government (PDVSA) were made in the form of semi-refined products to the oil companies for the investments in the facilities. Almost all of the upgraders cost in excess of 3 1/2 billion US. If you look at the companies involved, Conoco and ExxonMobil are the only US companies involved. Total is French, Statoil is from Norway and Veba is German. The largest support company to PDVSA in the country was Schlumberger which is also French. Even during the opening of the energy sector PDVSA maintained ownership of the crude reserves but foriegn companies were allowed to invest and recieve payments in products. From 1999 until 2005 I worked in the Crigenic Complex at Petrozuata and SINCOR. The vast gold reserves are located in the State of Bolivar at Las Cristinas mine and it has not been exploited in a number of years and the last company that won the concession and had it revoked recently was Crystalex a Canadian company. I guess what I am getting to is there is, or was, a very large international presence in Venezuela but non-US companies made up the bulk of the investments. Sorry Texas shoe you are right the US and EU are very different. The Europeans don't exploit, that's right, I should reread my history books. Also refining capabilities and extraction are one and the same??? Please read the below report from the DOE http://www.eia.doe.gov/cabs/Venezuela/Oil.html Foreign Operators In the 1990s, Venezuela opened its upstream oil sector to private investment. This collection of policies, called apertura, facilitated the creation of 32 operating service agreements (OSA) with 22 separate foreign oil companies, including international oil majors and small independents. Under these contracts, companies operated oil fields, and PdVSA paid these companies a fee and purchased the produced crude at a price pegged to market rates. PdVSA also offered eight blocks under risk/profit sharing agreements (RPSA), under which PdVSA had an option to purchase up to a 35 percent equity stake in the project if the foreign operator discovered commercial quantities of oil in the exploration phase. Finally, Venezuela established four “strategic associations” that produce extra-heavy crude, in which PdVSA held a financial interest. In the last 10 years, Venezuela has moved to largely undo most of the aperturainitiatives, including mandating PdVSA majority ownership of all oil projects and increasing tax and royalty rates on new and existing projects. The efforts culminated with the 2007 transition of the four extra-heavy strategic associations to new structures with PdVSA majority ownership. Of the six companies involved in the projects, two reduced their holdings to allow space for the enlarged PdVSA share (Total and Statoil), two maintained their previous stakes (Chevron, BP), and two exited completely from the projects (ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil). Recent attempts by Venezuela to attract foreign investment to the oil sector have focused on foreign national oil companies (NOCs), including those from China, India, Iran, and Russia. Conoco has a 50 percent interest in the partnership that owns the 70,000-barrel-per-day delayed coker and related facilities at the 247,000 bpd Sweeny refinery. Formerly Estrella. |
Post IP/Country: 69.122.243.5* / US | |
| #24 - Posted 23 September 2009, 7:02 PM | |
Location: United States, Brooklyn, NY Join date: August 2009 Member #: 3511 Posts: 245 | RE: US might have been involved in 2002 Chavez coup: Carter Quote: Escott previously said: I would have loved to have seen a George W Bush Presidency without a 9-11. I really wonder what it would have been like. I would have liked to have seen a Presidency with 9-11 with a tree hugger at the helm to see where we would have been. George Bush got a bad rap as would any other Republican by the Democrats. They certainly know how to bash without coming up with alternative ideas or for that matter "ANY IDEAS". So far I disagree with all of Obamas ideas. He scared me before the election for his lack of experience and since his election with the debt he has taken on (more scary for my children). I am not trying to change history. Just would have liked to have had a look see... PS> believe it or not I have been a registered Democrat for 20 plus years and an independant before that. Never a regi8stered Republican. I remember sitting at a bar with a guy that continually ran for office locally on the Dem ticket. He was also the town Dem Chairman. The guy was a cheap hustler. Always trying to sell me some sort of advertising and never successful. He was saying how "Stupid" Bush was. I asked him where he went to College. He said he attended SUNY New Paltz. I asked him if he thought it was as good a school as Yale because that is where bush went to school. He then said "His father did that for him" Please recall that no own is yet to complain about the war in Afghanistan!!! recall it is the location of the Mujahideen terror training camps and where Al Qaeda operates. Yet people do complain about Iraq. Iraq had no involvement in the 9-11 attacks. There were no weapons of mass destruction ever found, and if they were ever found they would have been american made because we put Saddam Hussein in power and armed him to fight the 9 year war against Iran. USSR supplied Iran, US supplied Iraq; your typical proxy war. No ties have yet to be found linking Saddam Hussein's regime to Al Qaeda, in fact he saw Al Qaeda as a threat to his choke-hold on his country. So here's an Idea for you, the US didn't have to go to Iraq!!!! instead you send your troops to Afghanistan to capture those who are really responsible. Thats why in Afghanistan there is a Global Coalition of troops supporting our war yet in Iraq it's the US and the Brits only. Get your facts straight!!!! Formerly Estrella. |
Post IP/Country: 69.122.243.5* / US | |