| #121 - Posted 16 December 2008, 9:55 AM | |
Location: United States, ø„¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨ Join date: June 2008 Member #: 926 Posts: 3419 | RE: Taino Ancestry Among Dominicans Quote: Lautaro previously said: Sorry about transforming your interesting thread into a battleground, nuk, it wasn't my intention at all. There's no need to apologize. The subject matter is worth discussing with anyone who's reasonable. ![]() ![]() Taino Villages Edited on 1/4/2009 11:15 AM by yumnuk3. |
Post IP: 207.38.219.24* | |
| Advertisement | |
Sponsored Links | |
| #122 - Posted 26 December 2008, 10:51 AM | |
Location: United States, ø„¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨ Join date: June 2008 Member #: 926 Posts: 3419 | RE: Taino Ancestry Among Dominicans Enriquillo's rebellion The Tainos Part 1 The Tainos Part 2 The Tainos Part 3 Edited on 1/12/2009 6:32 PM by yumnuk3. |
Post IP: 207.38.219.24* | |
| #123 - Posted 30 December 2008, 7:20 PM | |
Location: United States Join date: February 2008 Member #: 340 Posts: 1338 | RE: Taino Ancestry Among Dominicans Quote: Manhattanite previously said: Quote: Lautaro previously said: Ladronaso and Manhattanite, I'm calling extremely afrocentric people afronazis because they have fallen on the same trap of their white counterparts, that is, the maintainment of the "one drop rule" above all else. This stupid rule, also called hipodescendancy, establish that if a white man and black woman have offspring, this offspring will be labeled on the weaker of both groups, read, the son of white man and a black woman is a black child. The people trying to rescue Taino roots not only are fighting to save that groups' contributions from extinction, but they are also figthing for the right of us mixed people to choose the heritage that suits our spiritual needs, this is specially poignant on the dominican case, where a good part of the population is tri-racial, so I say let's fight these one-droppist scum with everytthing we've got, cuz' we've every right in the world to reclaim our Taino heritage, specially when we've known the truth all along. Thank God that on this very point the dominican psyche hasn't allowed itself to be absorbed by americanization (at least here on the island). It just seems too me that the afrocentric scholar is fighting for the same thing ('the right of ... people to choose the heritage that suits our spiritual needs'). They are also fighting against the perspective of 'be[ing] labeled on the weaker of both groups', which I'm saddened to hear you endorse Laut, and I hope I'm misreading that sentence. Since they are fighting that 'weak' label part of their job is necessarily to point out to groups that Africa is part f their heritage. But calling them scum? Fighting them with everything we've got? A bit out of proportion to reality as they (afrocentric scholars) are not the force behind the exclusion of our Taino heritage, are relatively recent arrivals on the history scene, share the mission of amplifying the heritage menu for people's needs, and as I said before they blazed the trail in the academy. Manhattanite, Perhaps you've come across some rather unusually open minded and respectful Afrocentric scholars, but unfortunately these seem to makeup the minority. I, along with many Dominicans here in the USA have come across alot of militant Afrocentric extemist. I have come across many threads/discussions about Dominicans, the overwhelming majority (actually all of them) started by African Americans with racialist blackcentric views. They represent the opposite and equally lopsided view as the Eurocentrics of the past, except with additionaly pent up anger. Dominicans' Taino heritage is ridiculed as some type of 'escape hatch' in order to downplay our Afrodecendancy. The two main arguments from them are that we either have none or a tiny negligible amount (no greater than what African Americans have). The fact that Dominicans use 'indio' as a color/phenotype descriptor further adds to their attacks, they interpret this as meaning we're calling ourselves 'native amerindians. The authors Lautaro mentioned fall into this category also. To sum it all up, they seek to impose a USA black/white manicheastic view on 'race' (OneDroppism) on DR. The European component in our heritage is attacked as coming fromthe 'oppresor/rapist', the Taino component is a fantasy, all that matters is the black component. Afronazi sums them all up. |
Post IP: 68.197.226.22* | |
| #124 - Posted 30 December 2008, 7:24 PM | |
Location: United States Join date: February 2008 Member #: 340 Posts: 1338 | RE: Taino Ancestry Among Dominicans Quote: Lautaro previously said: Quote: Manhattanite previously said: They are also fighting against the perspective of 'be[ing] labeled on the weaker of both groups', which I'm saddened to hear you endorse Laut, and I hope I'm misreading that sentence. Since they are fighting that 'weak' label part of their job is necessarily to point out to groups that Africa is part f their heritage. But calling them scum? Fighting them with everything we've got? A bit out of proportion to reality as they (afrocentric scholars) are not the force behind the exclusion of our Taino heritage, are relatively recent arrivals on the history scene, share the mission of amplifying the heritage menu for people's needs, and as I said before they blazed the trail in the academy. I don't think so, Manny, judging by how comfortable they feel with the establishment lumping all non-white people of african descent in one group (regardless of the fact that many of them possess a significant % of european ancestry, even more so than many Caribbean groups). It's a fact that, If the one drop rule didn't exist, AA's would be an even smaller community than what they already are, cuz' "blacks" of significant european ancestry would do as the majority of their LatAm counterparts (specially on Brazil) do, that is, to reject the black label in favor of one more closer to their european heritage or a in-between identity (cafuzo, pardo, etc.), like it was done also with the three tiered identity system of 19th century Louisiana, something that a good part of them are entitled to, in my humble opinion. That's why I'm saying that they have fallen in the system's trap, cuz' the ODR is the perfect, convenient cover for them to enlarge their numbers. Exactly. It seems like there are various complexes (inferiority? post colonial victim mentality? ) at play, I just read a story in Ebony magazine where a reporter states the majority of "Cubans are black, not olive skinned with black hair". There is nothing wrong with being either one, but one cannot help noticing the bias from reading the article. |
Post IP: 68.197.226.22* | |
| #125 - Posted 30 December 2008, 7:35 PM | |
Location: United States Join date: February 2008 Member #: 340 Posts: 1338 | RE: Taino Ancestry Among Dominicans Quote: Manhattanite previously said: Laut we won't see eye-to-eye on this one, but whether they are comfortable or not remember that , just like erasing Taino history, it was NOT afrocentric scholars who set up ODR or who propagate it. I'm still baffled by the not-so-subtle hostility you have for them. Cib I have made the same statement about the approximate phenotype of Dominicans. In the long run I'm glad that whole vocabulary is dying out. I have to disagree with you on this Manhattanite, the ODR was a European creaton imposed upon the Afrodescendant minority in order to keep the whites 'pure'. The ODR is no longer enforced but it has become culturally ingrained into both populations. African Americans who want to self-identify/represent any mixed heritage are very much a tiny minority (although it's getting more common). Don't you recall the Tiger Woods incident? This same type of mentality is part of what drives Afrocentric idealogues into ridiculing any culture/society that does not neatly divide their population between black and white. The very word mulatto is seen as an insult by them. The funny thing is, the have no idea how cultural this view is, Halle Berry, Barack Obama would not be seen as 'black' in Nigeria. I completely understand Lautaros hostility, Afrocentric scholars are just as bad as the Eurocentric ones. |
Post IP: 68.197.226.22* | |
| #126 - Posted 30 December 2008, 7:55 PM | |
Location: United States Join date: February 2008 Member #: 336 Posts: 1984 | RE: Taino Ancestry Among Dominicans MULE-atto does likely have an insulting etymology. I don't find it insulting per se, but as in the quote of mine above I would not shed tears for the entire set of descriptions. I'd also comment that it hardly matters what people would call Obama and Berry in Nigeria. The relevant comparisons are US, Europe, and Central/South America. In two of these places they would generally be seen as black. In the third it would depend on the size/location of their house. Like you said maybe I'm lucky to not meet these 'AfroNazi' types. Despite my presence on this board for this long, I usually avoid nests of racialism and zealotry. |
Post IP: 72.229.16.8* | |
| #127 - Posted 30 December 2008, 8:01 PM | |
Location: Dominican Republic, Santo Domingo Join date: December 2007 Member #: 38 Posts: 6156 | RE: Taino Ancestry Among Dominicans Quote: Manhattanite previously said: MULE-atto does likely have an insulting etymology. I don't find it insulting per se, but as in the quote of mine above I would not shed tears for the entire set of descriptions. I'd also comment that it hardly matters what people would call Obama and Berry in Nigeria. The relevant comparisons are US, Europe, and Central/South America. In two of these places they would generally be seen as black. In the third it would depend on the size/location of their house. Like you said maybe I'm lucky to not meet these 'AfroNazi' types. Despite my presence on this board for this long, I usually avoid nests of racialism and zealotry. You say two of these places, so, are sure that Europe as a whole submit to the one drop rule? Cuz' if I'm not mistaken, even the racial definitions of the Nazis are broader than the ones used by the US, and that's saying something. Example, by their racial deifinitions, not all the "bastards of the Rhineland" (that is, the children of german women with the french african legionnaires) would be labeled as "not aryan", read, non-white. On the US, on the contrary, they would have been automatically labeled as black, so that should tell you something about european flexibility in relation to the US. Edited on 12/30/2008 8:04 PM by Lautaro. "A man who strives after goodness in all his acts is sure to come to ruin, since there are so many men who are not good." Niccolo Macchiavelli - The Prince |
Post IP: 200.88.48.3* | |
| #128 - Posted 30 December 2008, 8:11 PM | |
Location: United States Join date: February 2008 Member #: 336 Posts: 1984 | RE: Taino Ancestry Among Dominicans Laut I'm sure in some SS manual there may have been 'broader' definitions, but in living practice do you think it would have changed whether H. Berry went into the ovens or not? This is a truly disturbing comparison for you to bring up seeing as Germans were burning groups that by most definitions are fellow Caucasians. These days maybe they would guess Barack Hussein was a Turk or Arab instead of Black, is that more sophisticated? In the final analysis yes I think the VAST majority of the volk in the Austrian and Prussian hinterlands would label these people 'ein Schwarzer'. |
Post IP: 72.229.16.8* | |
| #129 - Posted 31 December 2008, 8:25 AM | |
Location: Dominican Republic, Santo Domingo Join date: December 2007 Member #: 38 Posts: 6156 | RE: Taino Ancestry Among Dominicans Quote: Manhattanite previously said: Laut I'm sure in some SS manual there may have been 'broader' definitions, but in living practice do you think it would have changed whether H. Berry went into the ovens or not? This is a truly disturbing comparison for you to bring up seeing as Germans were burning groups that by most definitions are fellow Caucasians. These days maybe they would guess Barack Hussein was a Turk or Arab instead of Black, is that more sophisticated? In the final analysis yes I think the VAST majority of the volk in the Austrian and Prussian hinterlands would label these people 'ein Schwarzer'. Ok, my mistake. Can you say with a straight face that Spain and Portugal, the same ones which allowed "mestizaje" on their colonies (and have no problems with it on their homelands), follow the one-drop rule to the letter as the gringos of any colour, notwithstanding the elimination of the anti-miscegenation laws, still do? If you think so, then please show me the proofs, cuz' from what I have seen over there, their levels of miscegenation are way beyond the ones of the US by a wide margin, even when the south saharan africans are included on the analysis. Heck, even the stiff, upper-lipped brits can be seen as milder in comparison. Edited on 12/31/2008 8:30 AM by Lautaro. "A man who strives after goodness in all his acts is sure to come to ruin, since there are so many men who are not good." Niccolo Macchiavelli - The Prince |
Post IP: 200.88.48.3* | |
| #130 - Posted 31 December 2008, 11:25 AM | |
Location: United States Join date: February 2008 Member #: 336 Posts: 1984 | RE: Taino Ancestry Among Dominicans No Laut I can't back that up about the Iberians however I've never made that assertion, on this thread or elsewhere. I do agree totally that they had more mixing than the Anglo world, and a more nuanced system of racial supremacy. I disagree they have' no problem' with it in their homelands; after all much of Spain's history can be seen through the lens of constant grappling with identity (religious, racial, ideological, etc). I also disagree the Brits are any milder than US as Brits are so full of themselves they have not even fully mixed with the Celts they took their island from, much less their subjects worldwide. Meanwhile US Anglos did absorb some indigenous and African, even if in the system they set up one had to totally bury that heritage. As I said before I admit maybe I just don't visit the same haunts as you guys who have dealt with strident, absolutist Afrocentrics. |
Post IP: 206.252.74.4* | |

