| #61 - Posted 20 January 2009, 1:03 PM | |
Location: United States, Brooklyn Join date: December 2007 Member #: 40 Posts: 1865 | RE: PUERTO RICO: STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDANCE, WHAT WOULD THIS MEAN FOR DR ?? Quote: gouletcolonial previously said: Quote: CarlosFranco previously said: Here's my answer to Gouletcolonial Devin... Read it slowly... Other latinos would be green with envy... REALLY. If puerto ricans have not made a lasting contribution that made them speak for all hispanics in the last century... then it's doubtful that they will become that voice in the 21 century... Mexicans are the largest group, Cubans are well establashied and fanancially well off, Dominicans are progressing at a fast pace considerint we started migrating in mass numbers in the late 80's and early 90's. Colombians are doing well, in fact better than people from the caribbean... They're all doing well and not under puerto rican leadership GC you overestimate your people's leadership, and underestimate other latino's will to become leaders in their own communities. Latin American is turning the other way, and a legacy of dictatorship has left the region; Demacracy is flourishing, not as the US had hoped it would be, and within 50 years the countries we know today would be so different politically and economically... So while puerto rico may enjoy the benefits of union witht the US, it doesn't mean that other countries would not progress or even surpass it. Quote: devin11 previously said: Carlos, I don't know if your response was out of anger because of the comment that GC made in suggesting that anybody could possibly be envious of a PR political dynamism within the US through statehood or if you have higher standards for what consitutes a lasting contribution, what I do know is that your opinion was either based in ignorance of Puerto Rican contribution in America or denial of those realities in order to maintain an indifference to any gratitude. Please consider these "lasting contributions": Education - Chairmanships in many of the most renowned institutions of higher learning within the United States including M.I.T. World renowned educators in the fields of hydrometeorology, global warning and astrophysiology. Law - Free defense, litigation and counsel of many of the landmark Hispanic cases including bilingual education in the public school system through the Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund. Countless judgeships in all the court systems from, civil court through the Federal Court of Appeals. Military - Over 35 Military Generals and Admirals in the US Armed Forces as well as service in every US war since WWI and sacrifice of countless casualties that have helped the US maintain it's standing in the world and made it your choice in selecting a home. The only ever Hispanic Director of the C.I.A. Clandestine Services. Politics - Two US Surgeon Generals, (only 2 Hispanics ever, only female ever) Presidential Cabinet Positions, State Senators, Mayors, Congressman and House Committee Chairmanships, including the most powerful Comittee Chairmanship of all, the House Ways and Means Committee. Science - 75% of the NASA Hispanic employership is of Puerto Rican descent, these include 5 Directorships, including, Director of Mars Exploration, Director of Rocket Propulsion Systems, Director of Environmental Services. Scientist credited with helping to build the International Space Station. Cinema / Theatre - Multiple winning artists of Oscar, Tony, Grammy and Emmy Awards, from as early as the 1940's. For the sake of brevity I have only mentioned the above contributions and perhaps all of these accolades can and will be surpased by the comming immigrant groups as you have suggested, we cannot be sure. The only sure thing is that the bar has been set very high and not non-existent as you have suggested. Yeah Devin... these are all great things... but how does this translate to being a leader, for the sake of argument, in the Dominican community. You've been here the longest and have made contribution but how does that made the puerto ricans speak for all hispanics???? Are we too dumb that we can't be leaders and we need you to do it for us? Aren't Dominicans, Cubans and Mexicans and all other hundreth of nationalities in this country own their own??? If am going to say thank you to anyone, i would say it to Martin Luther King Jr. My response was an appropriate response to GC's comment "of all hispanics ENVYING puerto rico," not one made out of ignorance, but out of reality, or do you really think that i envy you? YES emphatically and you envy the Cubans as well.....you got a big complex... Yeah GC... I envy the Cubans and Puerto Ricans... Am dying to become one of you... I Ask GOD every morning why he didn't make me a CUBAN or a Puerto Rican... WHY GOD... WHY..... |
Post IP: 96.239.49.15* | |
| Advertisement | |
Sponsored Links | |
| #62 - Posted 20 January 2009, 2:20 PM | |
Location: United States Join date: February 2008 Member #: 336 Posts: 1699 | RE: PUERTO RICO: STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDANCE, WHAT WOULD THIS MEAN FOR DR ?? Quote: CarlosFranco previously said: And other groups carved out a space for Cuban and Puerto Ricans... And i don't see them thanking anyone, and them expect for us to kiss their ass !! The Irish and Italians made way for Catholics... The Blacks made way for people of color... Mexicans, Cuban, Ricans... for Dominicans, Colombians, Central American.... And the latter groups will make way for another group... and ROUND AND ROUND WE GO!! Agreed. I do think with PR/DR it's a bit more direct in terms of occupying very close geographic spaces in NYC and other Northern cities, but good observation. Edited on 1/20/2009 2:23 PM by Manhattanite. |
Post IP: 206.252.74.4* | |
| #63 - Posted 20 January 2009, 3:48 PM | |
Location: Cuba, it is a secret the censors are looking for me Join date: December 2007 Member #: 9 Posts: 13576 | RE: PUERTO RICO: STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDANCE, WHAT WOULD THIS MEAN FOR DR ?? Yeah Devin... these are all great things... but how does this translate to being a leader, for the sake of argument, in the Dominican community. You've been here the longest and have made contribution but how does that made the puerto ricans speak for all hispanics???? Are we too dumb that we can't be leaders and we need you to do it for us? Aren't Dominicans, Cubans and Mexicans and all other hundreth of nationalities in this country own their own??? If am going to say thank you to anyone, i would say it to Martin Luther King ..................they speak for all Hispanics because they will have 2 senators and 6 to 8 congressmen to lobby .....Instead of just fat boy Bill Richardson ...did I miss any other Hispanic senators lets get ready to RUUMMMMMMBBBLLLEE |
Post IP: 66.98.33.7* | |
| #64 - Posted 20 January 2009, 6:24 PM | |
Location: United States, The Greatest City Join date: March 2008 Member #: 469 Posts: 596 | RE: PUERTO RICO: STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDANCE, WHAT WOULD THIS MEAN FOR DR ?? Written by: CarlosFranco "Yeah Devin... these are all great things... but how does this translate to being a leader, for the sake of argument, in the Dominican community. You've been here the longest and have made contribution but how does that made the puerto ricans speak for all hispanics???? Are we too dumb that we can't be leaders and we need you to do it for us? Aren't Dominicans, Cubans and Mexicans and all other hundreth of nationalities in this country own their own??? If am going to say thank you to anyone, i would say it to Martin Luther King Jr. My response was an appropriate response to GC's comment "of all hispanics ENVYING puerto rico," not one made out of ignorance, but out of reality, or do you really think that i envy you?" Carlos, My response to you was not in any agreement with the GC comment of Puerto Rican envy or any such thing and no, I don't think you or anyone should envy me. I would not have responded to you at all if your response to GC would have been "nobody needs to envy Puerto Rico" or even if you said "the Dominican Republic is the most enviable country in the world". Either of those two comments would not have elicited a single response from me. My response was to your comment of "Puerto Ricans not having made a lasting contribution that speak for all Hispanics in the last 100 years" which is laughable and disavowal. I will respectfully, without asking you to read slowly or using any other insulting preposition, which is your communicative charm, explain to you how. Dominicans, Mexicans, Cubans, Panamenians, Puerto Ricans, Ecuadorians etc., see and embrace the differences in themselves and their prospective cultures, idiosyncrasies and social realities. To Americans, there is no difference, none at all. To the overwhelming majority of Americans, there is no difference between a Rodriguez from DR, PR, Ecuador or anywhere else in Latin America or the Carribbean Basin. The root cause is that Latin American and Carribbean historical studies are not part of the American Educational Curriculum, except to some small degree in the Collegiate or Graduate levels of education. As such, the very significant achievements by Puerto Ricans in the US have been shared by all Hispanics in that those achievements were filed in the minds of most Americans as Hispanic, not Puerto Rican. When Pedro Albizu Campos graduated from Harvard as the first Hispanic student do you think that if a Dominican or Cuban applied afterwards, they were turned down because only Puerto Ricans have proven they can graduate from Harvard? Of course not, it was seen as proof that Hispanics can be successful in the most regarded institutes of higher learning within the US and that all qualified Hispanics could apply. The accomplishments that I listed where not cited as a form of grandstanding but that they do "speak thunderously" for all Hispanic people because it speaks as proof to the American consciousness and the world over that if given the opportunity, Hispanic people can be successful in any endeavor which had up to that point not been attainable. I don't understand how you can not see those vast achievements as a lasting contribution that has spoken loudly for all Hispanics over the last 100 years. I don't expect you nor anybody else for that matter to feel any gratitude or be expected to kiss anybody's ass as you so crudely remarked, I know, I know, you have a bad temper. I do not however, expect you to say that the contributions were voiceless and of no meaning or benefit to other Hispanic groups. Edited on 1/20/2009 8:30 PM by devin11. |
Post IP: 24.90.190.3* | |
| #65 - Posted 20 January 2009, 7:02 PM | |
Location: Cuba, it is a secret the censors are looking for me Join date: December 2007 Member #: 9 Posts: 13576 | RE: PUERTO RICO: STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDANCE, WHAT WOULD THIS MEAN FOR DR ?? Quote: devin11 previously said: Excellent devin ....you completely understand ...the Boricuas did much of the heavy lifting in America for all Hispanics and along with Mexican Americans have left a larger footprint ....it would be good for all if Puerto Rico became a state.....I am neither Puerto Rican or Mexican or CubanWritten by: CarlosFranco "Yeah Devin... these are all great things... but how does this translate to being a leader, for the sake of argument, in the Dominican community. You've been here the longest and have made contribution but how does that made the puerto ricans speak for all hispanics???? Are we too dumb that we can't be leaders and we need you to do it for us? Aren't Dominicans, Cubans and Mexicans and all other hundreth of nationalities in this country own their own??? If am going to say thank you to anyone, i would say it to Martin Luther King Jr. My response was an appropriate response to GC's comment "of all hispanics ENVYING puerto rico," not one made out of ignorance, but out of reality, or do you really think that i envy you?" Carlos, My response to you was not in any agreement with the GC comment of Puerto Rican envy or any such thing and no, I don't think you or anyone should envy me. I would not have responded to you at all if your response to GC would have been "nobody needs to envy Puerto Rico" or even if you said "the Dominican Republic is the most enviable country in the world". Either of those two comments would not have elicited a single response from me. My response was to your comment of "Puerto Ricans not having made a lasting contribution that speak for all Hispanics in the last 100 years" which is laughable and disavowal. I will respectfully, without asking you to read slowly or using any other insulting preposition, that's your communicative charm, explain to you how. Dominicans, Mexicans, Cubans, Panamenians, Puerto Ricans, Ecuadorians etc., see and embrace the differences in themselves and their prospective cultures, idiosyncrasies and social realities. To Americans, there is no difference, none at all. To the overwhelming majority of Americans, there is no difference between a Rodriguez from DR, PR, Ecuador or anywhere else in Latin America or the Carribbean Basin. The root cause is that Latin American and Carribbean historical studies are not part of the American Educational Curriculum, except to some small degree in the Collegiate or Graduate levels of education. As such, the very significant achievements by Puerto Ricans in the US have been shared by all Hispanics in that those achievements were filed in the minds of most Americans as Hispanic and not Puerto Rican achievements. When Pedro Albizu Campos graduated from Harvard as the first Hispanic student do you think that if a Dominican or Cuban applied afterwards, they were turned down because only Puerto Ricans have proven they can graduate from Harvard? Of course not it was seen as proof that Hispanics can be successful in the most regarded institutes of higher learning within the US and that all qualified Hispanics could apply. The accomplishments that I listed where not cited as a form of grandstanding but they do "speak thunderously" for all Hispanic people because it is proof that if given the opportunity, Hispanic people can be successful in any endeavor which had up to that point not been attainable. I don't understand how you can not see those vast achievements as a lasting contribution that has spoken loudly for all Hispanics over the last 100 years. I don't expect you nor anybody else for that matter to feel any gratitude or be expected to kiss anybody's ass as you so crudely remarked, I know, I know, you have a bad temper. I do not however, expect you to say that the contributions were voiceless and of no meaning or benefit to other Hispanic groups. lets get ready to RUUMMMMMMBBBLLLEE |
Post IP: 66.98.33.7* | |
| #66 - Posted 20 January 2009, 7:50 PM | |
Location: United States, The Greatest City Join date: March 2008 Member #: 469 Posts: 596 | RE: PUERTO RICO: STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDANCE, WHAT WOULD THIS MEAN FOR DR ?? GC, As I have stated before, my grandmother was born in Puerto Rico to American parents of English extraction. She left PR as a small child never even having learned the language. I learned Spanish because I wanted to read the great Spanish Literary works in the original vernacular. I have no ties to PR or the PR culture and my posts never reflect a patriotic motility, had the posts been about Ugandans and I had the relative facts to dispel any counterfactual posts about Ugandans, I swear to you, I would have done so. I live in NYC and have met and befriended many Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, Mexicans etc., as well. I do believe that there is an animosity towards Puerto Ricans by many Hispanic groups which no one ever admits to but disguise as "Puerto Ricans think they are superior to us" as the reason for this animosity. Whenever there is a Hispanic issue regarding Immigration or any Hispanic injustice, you can be asured there will be Puerto Ricans standing in solidarity with their Hispanic brothers and sisters, every single time, no exceptions and with nothing to gain. The animosity comes from the deemed "special treatment" that PR gets from the US, which through US subsidation (welfare) allows PR to have the highest quality of life and living standard in the entire Spanish speaking Westen Hemisphere. The fact that Puerto Ricans are not deported, can visit their families or loved ones at any time, can travel the world as US citizens, don't have to deal with the immigration issues that other Hispanic groups have to as well as the painful separation of families any many other unfortunate realities are the "real" root causes of this contempt. It's human nature to feel animosity for such differing realities. That contempt is then veiled by the only genuinely visceral and derisive responses available, "PR is not free" or "PR is a welfare state", both true statements by the way but never spoken from a position of concern or interest, only from a position of contempt. As if any Latin American country is truly free or has ever turned down any Financial Aid, from any quarter. Of course nobody feels this consternation and animosity, nobody at all, or is it just that nobody will admit to it? Edited on 1/21/2009 6:18 PM by devin11. |
Post IP: 24.90.190.3* | |
| #67 - Posted 20 January 2009, 7:52 PM | |
Location: United States, Brooklyn Join date: December 2007 Member #: 40 Posts: 1865 | RE: PUERTO RICO: STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDANCE, WHAT WOULD THIS MEAN FOR DR ?? Quote: devin11 previously said: Written by: CarlosFranco "Yeah Devin... these are all great things... but how does this translate to being a leader, for the sake of argument, in the Dominican community. You've been here the longest and have made contribution but how does that made the puerto ricans speak for all hispanics???? Are we too dumb that we can't be leaders and we need you to do it for us? Aren't Dominicans, Cubans and Mexicans and all other hundreth of nationalities in this country own their own??? If am going to say thank you to anyone, i would say it to Martin Luther King Jr. My response was an appropriate response to GC's comment "of all hispanics ENVYING puerto rico," not one made out of ignorance, but out of reality, or do you really think that i envy you?" Carlos, My response to you was not in any agreement with the GC comment of Puerto Rican envy or any such thing and no, I don't think you or anyone should envy me. I would not have responded to you at all if your response to GC would have been "nobody needs to envy Puerto Rico" or even if you said "the Dominican Republic is the most enviable country in the world". Either of those two comments would not have elicited a single response from me. My response was to your comment of "Puerto Ricans not having made a lasting contribution that speak for all Hispanics in the last 100 years" which is laughable and disavowal. I will respectfully, without asking you to read slowly or using any other insulting preposition, that's your communicative charm, explain to you how. Dominicans, Mexicans, Cubans, Panamenians, Puerto Ricans, Ecuadorians etc., see and embrace the differences in themselves and their prospective cultures, idiosyncrasies and social realities. To Americans, there is no difference, none at all. To the overwhelming majority of Americans, there is no difference between a Rodriguez from DR, PR, Ecuador or anywhere else in Latin America or the Carribbean Basin. The root cause is that Latin American and Carribbean historical studies are not part of the American Educational Curriculum, except to some small degree in the Collegiate or Graduate levels of education. As such, the very significant achievements by Puerto Ricans in the US have been shared by all Hispanics in that those achievements were filed in the minds of most Americans as Hispanic, not Puerto Rican. When Pedro Albizu Campos graduated from Harvard as the first Hispanic student do you think that if a Dominican or Cuban applied afterwards, they were turned down because only Puerto Ricans have proven they can graduate from Harvard? Of course not, it was seen as proof that Hispanics can be successful in the most regarded institutes of higher learning within the US and that all qualified Hispanics could apply. The accomplishments that I listed where not cited as a form of grandstanding but that they do "speak thunderously" for all Hispanic people because it speaks as proof to the American consciousness and the world over that if given the opportunity, Hispanic people can be successful in any endeavor which had up to that point not been attainable. I don't understand how you can not see those vast achievements as a lasting contribution that has spoken loudly for all Hispanics over the last 100 years. I don't expect you nor anybody else for that matter to feel any gratitude or be expected to kiss anybody's ass as you so crudely remarked, I know, I know, you have a bad temper. I do not however, expect you to say that the contributions were voiceless and of no meaning or benefit to other Hispanic groups. Devin, we're in this together indeed... In Pennsylvania, Allentown, where my family owns a house, A white men whom we contracted to do maintenance on the house for us, in an attempt at insulting me, he called me a "fucking Puerto Rican" and threaten to take my spic ass to court, because his payment for the service he provided us with was late and he thought i had ripped him off. The point of this story is that while we share your achievements we also share the bad reputation.... Yes Devin... You Ricans have made contribution, lasting contribution, am not trying to undermine your culture and people, but let me explain what i meant to say when i wrote the following... "If Puerto Ricans have not made a lasting contribution that made them speak for all Hispanics in the last century... then it's doubtful that they will become that voice in the 21 century... Mexicans are the largest group, Cubans are well established and financially well off, Dominicans are progressing at a fast pace considering we started migrating in mass numbers in the late 80's and early 90's. Colombians are doing well, in fact better than people from the Caribbean... They're all doing well and not under Puerto Rican leadership" The above statement that you're so caught up on means... “KEYPHRASE "Contributions that made them speak for ALL Hispanics" When I say Lasting contribution that speaks off for all hispanic i mean that, if a Blackman gets discriminated or gets his rights denied... he can turn to Al Sharpton... Which Puerto Rican can i turned to if such thing happens to me. Puerto Ricans contributions have been made and it robs off on all other Hispanics, both the good and the bad, and that goes for all other Latinos MEXICANS, CUBAN, South American, ECT... Multiple nationalities make up the Hispanic identity... and each speaks for us whether is a crime or an achievement... Puerto Ricans have made achievements but Puerto Ricans are not the leaders of the Hispanic community... no single nationality claims that prize. below there's link of all leaders in the Hispanic community... Mexicans make up more than 50% of that list http://www.latinoleaders.com/secciones.php?id_sec=13&next=1 |
Post IP: 96.239.49.15* | |
| #68 - Posted 20 January 2009, 7:57 PM | |
Location: United States, Brooklyn Join date: December 2007 Member #: 40 Posts: 1865 | RE: PUERTO RICO: STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDANCE, WHAT WOULD THIS MEAN FOR DR ?? Quote: gouletcolonial previously said: Quote: devin11 previously said: Excellent devin ....you completely understand ...the Boricuas did much of the heavy lifting in America for all Hispanics and along with Mexican Americans have left a larger footprint ....it would be good for all if Puerto Rico became a state.....I am neither Puerto Rican or Mexican or CubanWritten by: CarlosFranco "Yeah Devin... these are all great things... but how does this translate to being a leader, for the sake of argument, in the Dominican community. You've been here the longest and have made contribution but how does that made the puerto ricans speak for all hispanics???? Are we too dumb that we can't be leaders and we need you to do it for us? Aren't Dominicans, Cubans and Mexicans and all other hundreth of nationalities in this country own their own??? If am going to say thank you to anyone, i would say it to Martin Luther King Jr. My response was an appropriate response to GC's comment "of all hispanics ENVYING puerto rico," not one made out of ignorance, but out of reality, or do you really think that i envy you?" Carlos, My response to you was not in any agreement with the GC comment of Puerto Rican envy or any such thing and no, I don't think you or anyone should envy me. I would not have responded to you at all if your response to GC would have been "nobody needs to envy Puerto Rico" or even if you said "the Dominican Republic is the most enviable country in the world". Either of those two comments would not have elicited a single response from me. My response was to your comment of "Puerto Ricans not having made a lasting contribution that speak for all Hispanics in the last 100 years" which is laughable and disavowal. I will respectfully, without asking you to read slowly or using any other insulting preposition, that's your communicative charm, explain to you how. Dominicans, Mexicans, Cubans, Panamenians, Puerto Ricans, Ecuadorians etc., see and embrace the differences in themselves and their prospective cultures, idiosyncrasies and social realities. To Americans, there is no difference, none at all. To the overwhelming majority of Americans, there is no difference between a Rodriguez from DR, PR, Ecuador or anywhere else in Latin America or the Carribbean Basin. The root cause is that Latin American and Carribbean historical studies are not part of the American Educational Curriculum, except to some small degree in the Collegiate or Graduate levels of education. As such, the very significant achievements by Puerto Ricans in the US have been shared by all Hispanics in that those achievements were filed in the minds of most Americans as Hispanic and not Puerto Rican achievements. When Pedro Albizu Campos graduated from Harvard as the first Hispanic student do you think that if a Dominican or Cuban applied afterwards, they were turned down because only Puerto Ricans have proven they can graduate from Harvard? Of course not it was seen as proof that Hispanics can be successful in the most regarded institutes of higher learning within the US and that all qualified Hispanics could apply. The accomplishments that I listed where not cited as a form of grandstanding but they do "speak thunderously" for all Hispanic people because it is proof that if given the opportunity, Hispanic people can be successful in any endeavor which had up to that point not been attainable. I don't understand how you can not see those vast achievements as a lasting contribution that has spoken loudly for all Hispanics over the last 100 years. I don't expect you nor anybody else for that matter to feel any gratitude or be expected to kiss anybody's ass as you so crudely remarked, I know, I know, you have a bad temper. I do not however, expect you to say that the contributions were voiceless and of no meaning or benefit to other Hispanic groups. Yeah GC, what is your nationality... you hidde under a name judging everyone but yet you're a ghost, reveal yourself... Where are your people from, so that i may fire back at your comments. Edited on 1/20/2009 8:00 PM by CarlosFranco. |
Post IP: 96.239.49.15* | |
| #69 - Posted 20 January 2009, 8:27 PM | |
Location: United States, The Greatest City Join date: March 2008 Member #: 469 Posts: 596 | RE: PUERTO RICO: STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDANCE, WHAT WOULD THIS MEAN FOR DR ?? Carlos, When your rights are violated for being Hispanic you can turn to the PR Defense League which has and continues to be at the forefront of all Landmark and Hispanic abuse cases in the US and far more effective than Al Sharpton. Or the Aspira organization which has been a consistant voice for all Hispanic issues of relevance within the Hispanic community. Congressman Rangel, Velasquez, Serrano etc. Presidential Cabinet appointee, Adolfo Carrion, will be a voice for all Hispanics on a national level. However, the most important voice that will speak for you, is YOU. I am certain you will do a great job at that, better than anyone else can or will for you. The achievements that I spoke about were only in the context of opening doors, an example of what can be done and continue to advance the Hispanic People. And please believe me when I tell you, as someone directly involved in crime and the dispensation of it's punishment, Hispanic groups do not need any help from Puerto Ricans to share our collectively bad reputations. LOL. |
Post IP: 24.90.190.3* | |
| #70 - Posted 20 January 2009, 9:39 PM | |
Location: United States Join date: December 2007 Member #: 4 Posts: 9090 | RE: PUERTO RICO: STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDANCE, WHAT WOULD THIS MEAN FOR DR ?? someone, i think it was Carlos Franco, offers that Colombians are doing well, better than caribbean people. which caribbean people? and in what categories are they doing well? in the USA, Colombians have the LOWEST per capita income of all immigrant groups. Indians have the highest per capita incomes, followed by Jamaicans. maybe Carlos can enlighten us about this doing well thing; i realise that per capita income in the USA is a singular criterion, but it points to levels of preparedness to assimilate into a first world ecosystem. |
Post IP: 200.88.34.23* | |