| #31 - Posted 1 April 2009, 9:43 AM | |
Location: United States, DR Join date: August 2008 Member #: 1291 Posts: 8401 | RE: top DR historian/book Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Re your comments about race we could also use this thread sort of with a little discrimination to keep out the crazies, to discuss that issue because we are achieving something here, and that is a point of clarity as of why we behave a certain way and our own particular definition of maybe being bias to blacks or just having the definition of a "black attitude" and yet not prejudiced to blacks, if you can separate the two. An Dominican anthropologist would be a welcome addition to our panel. Regarding Puerto Ricans I find them very white and a very classist society as well. I lived there for a while, and yes they are much whiter in general than Dominicans, and the trend of the "upper classes" is going towards just speaking english in some places as a measure of exclusivity and their feelings of superiority to us and the "jibaro" lower classes. This really disturbed me when I lived there as sometimes persons would just say to me "english" please and it was obvious that they spoke spanish. As someone who has grown up in a Puerto Rican neighborhood here in New York and who has been to PR several times I would say that the Puerto Rican people are, in the majority, undoubtebly of mixed ancestry. The main component of this mix is definitely white mediterranean but there is a very strong undercurrent of African and indegenous blood in their population. A walk through any of their neighborhoods here in the city would bear witness to said fact. A Puerto Rican is just a sand-blasted Dominican...LOL If you have not resided in Puerto Rico you can not understand my statements by just visiting for a few days or weeks. So your conclusions just based in the New York Puerto Ricans is mostly wrong. Living in Puerto Rico, having a home, car, work, and actually socializing every day with natives gives you another perspective called biculturalism, which you do not posses in your empirical description of your faulty analysis based on anecdotal information. "Speak softly, and carry a big stick, you will go far". |
Post IP: 66.98.82.7* | |
| Advertisement | |
Sponsored Links | |
| #32 - Posted 1 April 2009, 9:49 AM | |
Location: Dominican Republic, Santo Domingo Join date: December 2007 Member #: 38 Posts: 5613 | RE: top DR historian/book Quote: generoso previously said: Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Re your comments about race we could also use this thread sort of with a little discrimination to keep out the crazies, to discuss that issue because we are achieving something here, and that is a point of clarity as of why we behave a certain way and our own particular definition of maybe being bias to blacks or just having the definition of a "black attitude" and yet not prejudiced to blacks, if you can separate the two. An Dominican anthropologist would be a welcome addition to our panel. Regarding Puerto Ricans I find them very white and a very classist society as well. I lived there for a while, and yes they are much whiter in general than Dominicans, and the trend of the "upper classes" is going towards just speaking english in some places as a measure of exclusivity and their feelings of superiority to us and the "jibaro" lower classes. This really disturbed me when I lived there as sometimes persons would just say to me "english" please and it was obvious that they spoke spanish. As someone who has grown up in a Puerto Rican neighborhood here in New York and who has been to PR several times I would say that the Puerto Rican people are, in the majority, undoubtebly of mixed ancestry. The main component of this mix is definitely white mediterranean but there is a very strong undercurrent of African and indegenous blood in their population. A walk through any of their neighborhoods here in the city would bear witness to said fact. A Puerto Rican is just a sand-blasted Dominican...LOL If you have not resided in Puerto Rico you can not understand my statements by just visiting for a few days or weeks. So your conclusions just based in the New York Puerto Ricans is mostly wrong. Living in Puerto Rico, having a home, car, work, and actually socializing every day with natives gives you another perspective called biculturalism, which you do not posses in your empirical description of your faulty analysis based on anecdotal information. You're right, general. Having lived among both communities (PR's of the island and the ones of the mainland), I'm witness to the fact that, racially speaking, they're as different as night from day. The PR from the mainland is almost a twin brother to a common dominican, whereas the PR from the island have more in common with the cubans from Florida than they will ever have with us (excepting from the ones whose families have recent dominican ancestry, that is). "A man who strives after goodness in all his acts is sure to come to ruin, since there are so many men who are not good." Niccolo Macchiavelli - The Prince |
Post IP: 200.88.48.3* | |
| #33 - Posted 1 April 2009, 10:01 AM | |
Location: United States, New York City Join date: February 2008 Member #: 411 Posts: 5683 | RE: top DR historian/book Quote: generoso previously said: Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Re your comments about race we could also use this thread sort of with a little discrimination to keep out the crazies, to discuss that issue because we are achieving something here, and that is a point of clarity as of why we behave a certain way and our own particular definition of maybe being bias to blacks or just having the definition of a "black attitude" and yet not prejudiced to blacks, if you can separate the two. An Dominican anthropologist would be a welcome addition to our panel. Regarding Puerto Ricans I find them very white and a very classist society as well. I lived there for a while, and yes they are much whiter in general than Dominicans, and the trend of the "upper classes" is going towards just speaking english in some places as a measure of exclusivity and their feelings of superiority to us and the "jibaro" lower classes. This really disturbed me when I lived there as sometimes persons would just say to me "english" please and it was obvious that they spoke spanish. As someone who has grown up in a Puerto Rican neighborhood here in New York and who has been to PR several times I would say that the Puerto Rican people are, in the majority, undoubtebly of mixed ancestry. The main component of this mix is definitely white mediterranean but there is a very strong undercurrent of African and indegenous blood in their population. A walk through any of their neighborhoods here in the city would bear witness to said fact. A Puerto Rican is just a sand-blasted Dominican...LOL If you have not resided in Puerto Rico you can not understand my statements by just visiting for a few days or weeks. So your conclusions just based in the New York Puerto Ricans is mostly wrong. Living in Puerto Rico, having a home, car, work, and actually socializing every day with natives gives you another perspective called biculturalism, which you do not posses in your empirical description of your faulty analysis based on anecdotal information. As far as I know New York Puerto Ricans are just that, Puerto Ricans, so to a come conclusion on their people's phenotype based on them alone is not at all absurd as they are well represented in the city. They're not from Mars, after all. Secondly, why is spending a few weeks in PR not enough time to come to a conclusion about the phentotype on the island? Do people's features become more apparent AFTER a few weeks? Of course not. I cannot make the same observations on Puerto Rican SOCIETY that someone who has actually lived on the island can make but its preposterous to say the same about physical appearances. Someone with pictures of thousands of different Puerto ricans can come to a valid conclusion on their phenotype and the components that contributed to it based on photographic evidence alone without ever visitng the island or anywhere where they are concentrated. To say otherwise is to negate the power of visual observation. What the eye sees are images, not "anecdotes". Edited on 4/1/2009 10:04 AM by cibaeño75. "If you're going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill |
Post IP: 161.185.150.17* | |
| #34 - Posted 1 April 2009, 10:15 AM | |
Location: United States Join date: February 2008 Member #: 340 Posts: 1299 | RE: top DR historian/book Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Re your comments about race we could also use this thread sort of with a little discrimination to keep out the crazies, to discuss that issue because we are achieving something here, and that is a point of clarity as of why we behave a certain way and our own particular definition of maybe being bias to blacks or just having the definition of a "black attitude" and yet not prejudiced to blacks, if you can separate the two. An Dominican anthropologist would be a welcome addition to our panel. Regarding Puerto Ricans I find them very white and a very classist society as well. I lived there for a while, and yes they are much whiter in general than Dominicans, and the trend of the "upper classes" is going towards just speaking english in some places as a measure of exclusivity and their feelings of superiority to us and the "jibaro" lower classes. This really disturbed me when I lived there as sometimes persons would just say to me "english" please and it was obvious that they spoke spanish. As someone who has grown up in a Puerto Rican neighborhood here in New York and who has been to PR several times I would say that the Puerto Rican people are, in the majority, undoubtebly of mixed ancestry. The main component of this mix is definitely white mediterranean but there is a very strong undercurrent of African and indegenous blood in their population. A walk through any of their neighborhoods here in the city would bear witness to said fact. A Puerto Rican is just a sand-blasted Dominican...LOL Cib, As someone who has also grown up around Puerto Ricans all my life, been there many times, and was raised by a Puerto Rican step-father I also have the same experience. Another way of putting it is that a Dominican is a Puerto Rican with more African pimp juice. |
Post IP: 68.197.226.22* | |
| #35 - Posted 1 April 2009, 10:38 AM | |
Location: United States Join date: February 2008 Member #: 336 Posts: 1984 | RE: top DR historian/book Quote: generoso previously said: ....which you do not posses in your empirical description of your faulty analysis based on anecdotal information. At least he isn't plagiarizing! |
Post IP: 206.252.74.4* | |
| #36 - Posted 1 April 2009, 10:43 AM | |
Location: United States, DR Join date: August 2008 Member #: 1291 Posts: 8401 | RE: top DR historian/book Quote: Lautaro previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Re your comments about race we could also use this thread sort of with a little discrimination to keep out the crazies, to discuss that issue because we are achieving something here, and that is a point of clarity as of why we behave a certain way and our own particular definition of maybe being bias to blacks or just having the definition of a "black attitude" and yet not prejudiced to blacks, if you can separate the two. An Dominican anthropologist would be a welcome addition to our panel. Regarding Puerto Ricans I find them very white and a very classist society as well. I lived there for a while, and yes they are much whiter in general than Dominicans, and the trend of the "upper classes" is going towards just speaking english in some places as a measure of exclusivity and their feelings of superiority to us and the "jibaro" lower classes. This really disturbed me when I lived there as sometimes persons would just say to me "english" please and it was obvious that they spoke spanish. As someone who has grown up in a Puerto Rican neighborhood here in New York and who has been to PR several times I would say that the Puerto Rican people are, in the majority, undoubtebly of mixed ancestry. The main component of this mix is definitely white mediterranean but there is a very strong undercurrent of African and indegenous blood in their population. A walk through any of their neighborhoods here in the city would bear witness to said fact. A Puerto Rican is just a sand-blasted Dominican...LOL If you have not resided in Puerto Rico you can not understand my statements by just visiting for a few days or weeks. So your conclusions just based in the New York Puerto Ricans is mostly wrong. Living in Puerto Rico, having a home, car, work, and actually socializing every day with natives gives you another perspective called biculturalism, which you do not posses in your empirical description of your faulty analysis based on anecdotal information. You're right, general. Having lived among both communities (PR's of the island and the ones of the mainland), I'm witness to the fact that, racially speaking, they're as different as night from day. The PR from the mainland is almost a twin brother to a common dominican, whereas the PR from the island have more in common with the cubans from Florida than they will ever have with us (excepting from the ones whose families have recent dominican ancestry, that is). I try not to make statements just to prove the fact that I may be right. If it offends somebody's racial sensitivity or opinions, that is too bad. In any court of public opinion, a bicultural individual opinion has more weight than just a bilingual one that has read some books and seen a few photographs. The same as a person residing in DR at present has more weight in his particular opinions about what's happening in the country right now, than a Dominican york., who is living with the diaspora and not really breathing the smells, reading the newspapers, stuck in traffic, playing dominoes, and socializing every day with common hard working Dominicans trying to survive in a tough world. Edited on 4/1/2009 10:45 AM by generoso. "Speak softly, and carry a big stick, you will go far". |
Post IP: 66.98.82.7* | |
| #37 - Posted 1 April 2009, 10:52 AM | |
Location: United States, New York City Join date: February 2008 Member #: 411 Posts: 5683 | RE: top DR historian/book Quote: generoso previously said: Quote: Lautaro previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Re your comments about race we could also use this thread sort of with a little discrimination to keep out the crazies, to discuss that issue because we are achieving something here, and that is a point of clarity as of why we behave a certain way and our own particular definition of maybe being bias to blacks or just having the definition of a "black attitude" and yet not prejudiced to blacks, if you can separate the two. An Dominican anthropologist would be a welcome addition to our panel. Regarding Puerto Ricans I find them very white and a very classist society as well. I lived there for a while, and yes they are much whiter in general than Dominicans, and the trend of the "upper classes" is going towards just speaking english in some places as a measure of exclusivity and their feelings of superiority to us and the "jibaro" lower classes. This really disturbed me when I lived there as sometimes persons would just say to me "english" please and it was obvious that they spoke spanish. As someone who has grown up in a Puerto Rican neighborhood here in New York and who has been to PR several times I would say that the Puerto Rican people are, in the majority, undoubtebly of mixed ancestry. The main component of this mix is definitely white mediterranean but there is a very strong undercurrent of African and indegenous blood in their population. A walk through any of their neighborhoods here in the city would bear witness to said fact. A Puerto Rican is just a sand-blasted Dominican...LOL If you have not resided in Puerto Rico you can not understand my statements by just visiting for a few days or weeks. So your conclusions just based in the New York Puerto Ricans is mostly wrong. Living in Puerto Rico, having a home, car, work, and actually socializing every day with natives gives you another perspective called biculturalism, which you do not posses in your empirical description of your faulty analysis based on anecdotal information. You're right, general. Having lived among both communities (PR's of the island and the ones of the mainland), I'm witness to the fact that, racially speaking, they're as different as night from day. The PR from the mainland is almost a twin brother to a common dominican, whereas the PR from the island have more in common with the cubans from Florida than they will ever have with us (excepting from the ones whose families have recent dominican ancestry, that is). I try not to make statements just to prove the fact that I may be right. If it offends somebody's racial sensitivity or opinions, that is too bad. In any court of public opinion, a bicultural individual opinion has more weight than just a bilingual one that has read some books and seen a few photographs. The same as a person residing in DR at present has more weight in his particular opinions about what's happening in the country right now, than a Dominican york., who is living with the diaspora and not really breathing the smells, reading the newspapers, stuck in traffic, playing dominoes, and socializing every day with common hard working Dominicans trying to survive in a tough world. Perhaps. But I wasn't discussing what's happening in PR. I was discussing the racial make-up of the Puerto Rican population based on personal observation. If we were to discuss it on a genetic level then my argument based on my observations would become irrefutable. "If you're going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill |
Post IP: 161.185.150.18* | |
| #38 - Posted 1 April 2009, 11:03 AM | |
Location: United States, DR Join date: August 2008 Member #: 1291 Posts: 8401 | RE: top DR historian/book Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Quote: Lautaro previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Re your comments about race we could also use this thread sort of with a little discrimination to keep out the crazies, to discuss that issue because we are achieving something here, and that is a point of clarity as of why we behave a certain way and our own particular definition of maybe being bias to blacks or just having the definition of a "black attitude" and yet not prejudiced to blacks, if you can separate the two. An Dominican anthropologist would be a welcome addition to our panel. Regarding Puerto Ricans I find them very white and a very classist society as well. I lived there for a while, and yes they are much whiter in general than Dominicans, and the trend of the "upper classes" is going towards just speaking english in some places as a measure of exclusivity and their feelings of superiority to us and the "jibaro" lower classes. This really disturbed me when I lived there as sometimes persons would just say to me "english" please and it was obvious that they spoke spanish. As someone who has grown up in a Puerto Rican neighborhood here in New York and who has been to PR several times I would say that the Puerto Rican people are, in the majority, undoubtebly of mixed ancestry. The main component of this mix is definitely white mediterranean but there is a very strong undercurrent of African and indegenous blood in their population. A walk through any of their neighborhoods here in the city would bear witness to said fact. A Puerto Rican is just a sand-blasted Dominican...LOL If you have not resided in Puerto Rico you can not understand my statements by just visiting for a few days or weeks. So your conclusions just based in the New York Puerto Ricans is mostly wrong. Living in Puerto Rico, having a home, car, work, and actually socializing every day with natives gives you another perspective called biculturalism, which you do not posses in your empirical description of your faulty analysis based on anecdotal information. You're right, general. Having lived among both communities (PR's of the island and the ones of the mainland), I'm witness to the fact that, racially speaking, they're as different as night from day. The PR from the mainland is almost a twin brother to a common dominican, whereas the PR from the island have more in common with the cubans from Florida than they will ever have with us (excepting from the ones whose families have recent dominican ancestry, that is). I try not to make statements just to prove the fact that I may be right. If it offends somebody's racial sensitivity or opinions, that is too bad. In any court of public opinion, a bicultural individual opinion has more weight than just a bilingual one that has read some books and seen a few photographs. The same as a person residing in DR at present has more weight in his particular opinions about what's happening in the country right now, than a Dominican york., who is living with the diaspora and not really breathing the smells, reading the newspapers, stuck in traffic, playing dominoes, and socializing every day with common hard working Dominicans trying to survive in a tough world. Perhaps. But I wasn't discussing what's happening in PR. I was discussing the racial make-up of the Puerto Rican population based on personal observation. If we were to discuss it on a genetic level then my argument based on my observations would become irrefutable. You are so sure of yourself and your own opinions that you are consider what you write omniescence as well, using the word "irrefutable", what more can I say? Sorry master. Sig Heil! Edited on 4/1/2009 11:11 AM by generoso. "Speak softly, and carry a big stick, you will go far". |
Post IP: 66.98.82.7* | |
| #39 - Posted 1 April 2009, 11:09 AM | |
Location: United States, DR Join date: August 2008 Member #: 1291 Posts: 8401 | RE: top DR historian/book Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Get "Foundations of Despotism" Peasants, the Trujillo regime, and modernity in Dominican History, by Ricard Lee Turits. Best book on the subject I have read so far, and I have read many. It is a powerful critique of the simplistic demonizing of the dictatorial model of politics used by Trujillo. It also makes you understand why the guerrilla uprisings didn't succeed in the DR and they did in Cuba. "One of the best works ever done on the Dominican Republic, this wonderful book goes a long way toward explaining not only the long-lived Trujillo dictatorship but subsequent Dominican social and political history as well. It is also a powerful critique of the simplistic demonizing of the Caribbean dictatorial model of politics attached to strongmen like Trujillo, Somoza, and Duvalier." - Lowell Gudmundson, Mount Holyoke College It's called plagiarism. How could I be guilty of plagiarism for sharing the public information of a book to readers taken from the book's back cover and adding my own, for the purpose of promoting that same book? You finger pointing is a cheap shot, when we are trying to promote reading here, not steal somebody's else thunder for our own profit, benefit and glorification. Maybe I omitted the punctuation marks, what about the rest of my statement that you conveniently omitted? What is this the Inquisition? What earthy pleasure to you get from trying to ridicule others of wrongdoing, in such a cynic manner? And by the way I do not agree to place Somoza and Duvalier peasant policys with Trujillo's so the statement is my own interpretation. "Speak softly, and carry a big stick, you will go far". |
Post IP: 66.98.82.7* | |
| #40 - Posted 1 April 2009, 11:11 AM | |
Location: United States, New York City Join date: February 2008 Member #: 411 Posts: 5683 | RE: top DR historian/book Quote: generoso previously said: Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Quote: Lautaro previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Quote: cibaeño75 previously said: Quote: generoso previously said: Re your comments about race we could also use this thread sort of with a little discrimination to keep out the crazies, to discuss that issue because we are achieving something here, and that is a point of clarity as of why we behave a certain way and our own particular definition of maybe being bias to blacks or just having the definition of a "black attitude" and yet not prejudiced to blacks, if you can separate the two. An Dominican anthropologist would be a welcome addition to our panel. Regarding Puerto Ricans I find them very white and a very classist society as well. I lived there for a while, and yes they are much whiter in general than Dominicans, and the trend of the "upper classes" is going towards just speaking english in some places as a measure of exclusivity and their feelings of superiority to us and the "jibaro" lower classes. This really disturbed me when I lived there as sometimes persons would just say to me "english" please and it was obvious that they spoke spanish. As someone who has grown up in a Puerto Rican neighborhood here in New York and who has been to PR several times I would say that the Puerto Rican people are, in the majority, undoubtebly of mixed ancestry. The main component of this mix is definitely white mediterranean but there is a very strong undercurrent of African and indegenous blood in their population. A walk through any of their neighborhoods here in the city would bear witness to said fact. A Puerto Rican is just a sand-blasted Dominican...LOL If you have not resided in Puerto Rico you can not understand my statements by just visiting for a few days or weeks. So your conclusions just based in the New York Puerto Ricans is mostly wrong. Living in Puerto Rico, having a home, car, work, and actually socializing every day with natives gives you another perspective called biculturalism, which you do not posses in your empirical description of your faulty analysis based on anecdotal information. You're right, general. Having lived among both communities (PR's of the island and the ones of the mainland), I'm witness to the fact that, racially speaking, they're as different as night from day. The PR from the mainland is almost a twin brother to a common dominican, whereas the PR from the island have more in common with the cubans from Florida than they will ever have with us (excepting from the ones whose families have recent dominican ancestry, that is). I try not to make statements just to prove the fact that I may be right. If it offends somebody's racial sensitivity or opinions, that is too bad. In any court of public opinion, a bicultural individual opinion has more weight than just a bilingual one that has read some books and seen a few photographs. The same as a person residing in DR at present has more weight in his particular opinions about what's happening in the country right now, than a Dominican york., who is living with the diaspora and not really breathing the smells, reading the newspapers, stuck in traffic, playing dominoes, and socializing every day with common hard working Dominicans trying to survive in a tough world. Perhaps. But I wasn't discussing what's happening in PR. I was discussing the racial make-up of the Puerto Rican population based on personal observation. If we were to discuss it on a genetic level then my argument based on my observations would become irrefutable. You are so sure of yourself and your own opinions that you are consider and what you write omniescence as well, using the word "irrefutable", what more can I say? Sorry master. Sig Heil! Here's a study of the genetic breakdown of the Puerto Rican population that was conducted by the RUM (you should know what that is since you lived over there for so long): http://www.centrelink.org/KearnsDNA.html This is not an opinion. As far as DNA is concerned the Puerto Rican people are not white in the majority but are a mixed people and a scan with the naked eye of any Puerto Rican population center would bear witness to said fact. It indeed irrefutable unless you have something more foolproof than genetic evidence. "If you're going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill |
Post IP: 161.185.150.18* | |