Close Gallery
Rafael Trujillo.
Zoom Picture

SANTO DOMINGO.- A journalist and historian said there’s "forceful and irrefutable" proof of the United States Government’s  participation in the plot to physically eliminate the dictator Rafael Trujillo.

Víctor Grimaldi, in a 12 page document published in: osersosa.blogspot.com, said to deny the U.S. took part in Trujillo’s death is to “try to block the sun with a finger.”

He said in the first interrogations into the judicial case in June 2, 1961 –which can be obtained on the Internet- several of Trujillo’s executioners said their plans to kill Trujillo and to take power had the U.S. Government’s support.

He said at as a plot the May 30 affair was a failure because only the regime’s most visible head was eliminated.

Grimaldi said the Dominicans -and the their relatives- who took part in Trujillo’s execution were tortured and murdered, without the U.S.’s protection, though several  American agents involved in the conspiracy - among them Wallace Berry, alias Lorenzo Wimpys- received foreign protection and were placed out of danger outside the country.

The journalist said U.S. documents already of public knowledge, mainly in 1965, indicate that Wimpys was spying against and exposing the patriotic constitutionalists.

"From the knowlege of his Government’s responsibility in the plot against Trujillo, senator Allen Ellender had said on April 30, 1965 when delivering a speech to his United States Senate colleagues that it had been a "shameful involvement of the United States in the overthrow of Trujillo,” Grimaldi said.

Proof of the U.S. Government’s involvement  in the Trujillo case are in president Dwight Eisenhower’s memoirs, and the internal report "Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders," presented November 20, 1975 by the U.S. Senate Select Committee created to investigate intelligence activities and the plans to eliminate foreign leaders.

Grimaldi said that in his book ‘Tumbaron al Jefe’ (they toppled the chief), documentary evidence shows the American implication.

Share / Recommend this article: FacebookFacebook Digg thisDigg this del.icio.usdel.icio.us TechnoratiTechnorati YahooYahoo Facebook
COMMENTS
4 comment(s)
Written by: Ney, 26 Jun 2007 9:35 PM
From: Indiana
Where have these so called researchers been? Isn't this common knowledge?
Written by: Tuan, 27 Jun 2007 8:10 AM
From: PoP
Not only old news, but all happened under the auspices of the Democratic party -- Kennedy 1961, Johnson 1965 -- yet only a Republican is mentioned. Though I might agree with the writer's bias, I detest the ease with which he slants history.
Written by: Gary, 27 Jun 2007 1:18 PM
From: Canada
He is lucky that i was not living in the D.R. at that time because i would have opened fire on the slimebag with my .50 caliber handgun!!!
Written by: Billy H. Adams, 28 Jun 2007 12:29 PM
From: Santiago, Santiago
I am not denying the US involvement in the assassination plot against Trujillo, but would remind reaaders that there are those who would take, out of context, verbage which tends to support their allegations and thereby change the historical facts and attempt to apply the results to current events.
This has been the 'modus oporindi' of many a journalist and historian.
Seek the facts for yourself and don't ever accept the writings as 'gospel' unless factually presented in full.
Research t
Post Your Comment | Not a member? Create your account | Lost your password?
Write your opinion here. Please keep your comment relevant to this article. Please note that any comments which contain offensive language or discriminatory expressions may be edited/removed.
You must log in to post a comment:
Username Password