do not retain- fire them!

And the BIG winner is..........the ex National District PROSECUTOR @ 171 million.

Me sorprende que esto sea noticia como si fuera novedad o sorprendente. Las leyes dominicanas, como muchas otras partes del tercer y primer mundo, existen solo para castigar al que esta abajo. Mientras existan individuos embriagados por la avaricia del poder, tendran presidentes como el actual y los anteriores. Si esta es una violacion que hasta el presidente viola, si la sociedad se respetara, hace tiempo que le habrian sacado a palos del palacio.

Portraying this fact as news quixotic. Dominican laws are only enforced against the lower (economic) class perhaps like is the case in several other third (and industrialized) countries. As long as individualizing and greed exists, presidents like those in recent history will continue to be "elected." Should this lack of transparency be a crime, a respectable society would have already taken care of them and started on a clean slate. It is a shame to be related to such pusillanimous homunculi.

Where are PLD boot lickers like Chauncey to defend the transperancy of Lie-onel's "enlightened" administration! Chauncey ask to see Diandino's financial statement!

fire them..... hubris poss

Diandino doesn't hav financial statements; he has a shoebox where he keeps the cash and loose change. He would have to sit down and go through it.

This is the most honest statement of what Lie-onel and the PLD feel about the Rule of Law!

If that doesn't qualify as the comments of administrators of a Failed State, I don't know what does!

Source DR1

Government's decision 'illegal'

Listin Diario reports that the government's decision not to lower gasoline prices is illegal and violates Hydro-Carbides Law 112-00. The assertion comes after Economy, Planning and Development Minister Temistocles Montas announced that although international fuel prices are dropping, the government wouldn't follow suit. Montas stated that the government would not lower prices because it had to recoup revenue losses that were absorbed by the government when the price for a barrel of petroleum was US$150. Montas explained that during those months the government chose not to pass the cost of fuel on to the consumer. Economists Fernando Alvarez Bogaert and Leopoldo Espaillat Nanita criticized the minister's arguments.

Continued:

Both say that failing to reduce fuel prices could have negative effects on competitiveness and could continue to affect the construction and commercial sector. Espaillat says he doesn't understand how the government could violate the law, and urged it to be transparent and apply the law.

He was also critical of the Superintendent of Energy's statement that the law is followed only when possible.

"..the law is followed only when possible." ha ha ha...only when it is convenient ! and when it is not.....you change the law. Welcome, everybody, back to the topic of constitutional reform...what a joke.