Close Gallery
Presidential candidates Miguel Vargas, Leonel Fernandez.
Zoom Picture

SANTO DOMINGO.- Abstention in next week’s presidential elections will be 27 percent more than in 2004 and Dominican voters will be forced to elect the “least worse,” affirmed the political analyst Pedro Catrain yesterday.

"Abstention will increase in this process. There is a tendency, marked by skepticism, the lack of hope, the absence of proposals and the nature of the candidates."

If fewer citizens go to the ballot boxes loss, the votes a candidate needs to win in the first round will be less than 2,075,181 votes, or 50 percent plus one, in the event the proportion of 72 percent of the valid votes remains.

There are 5,764,387 registered voters, with 72 percent equaling 4,150,359 and half plus one equals 2,075,181.

In 1996 the proportion of valid votes was 77.6 percent; 75.1 percent in 2000 and 72 percent in 2004, a slide Catrain says will widen on May 16,

As to the country’s traditional political groups, Catrain says "we’re faced with three bad options."

"The process to choose the least of the worse was exhausted because in 2000 the vote was for Hipólito (Mejia) to get rid of Leonel (Fernandez) and in 2004 it was for Leonel to get rid of Hipólito," he said in an interview televised by CDN.

The political analyst said the current options don’t guarantee any type of change for society. “There’s a very skeptical electorate, which means abstention will increase.”

Share / Recommend this article: FacebookFacebook Digg thisDigg this del.icio.usdel.icio.us TechnoratiTechnorati YahooYahoo Facebook
COMMENTS
51 comment(s)
Written by: juanb, 8 May 2008 10:26 AM
From: Dominican Republic
Let's see....The choice seems to be between a guy who inherited country on the verge of bankruptcy, made some difficult choices that certainly didn't please everyone and pulled the country out of the disaster he was left with by the PRD. At least he tried to balance income and expense. True, he did nowhere near enough about the rampant corruption and stealing going on (he may actually have done nothing) and he underfunded the educational system so that we now suffer from the same uneducated masses that we have always had.
Or.....we can vote for a guy who's only claim to fame is that his vast wealth is unexplained, he was a memeber of the previous administration, which is when he obtained his wealth, and he promises to continue in the proud tradition of the PRD. That means he WILL bankrupt the country as his former PRD buddy tried. He has promised to spend billions, and at the same time cut all gov't income, as well as promising everything to every one.........
HMMMM...let me think
Written by: juanb, 8 May 2008 10:28 AM
From: Dominican Republic
Could DT have found 2 less flattering photos?
Written by: baldoria23, 8 May 2008 10:49 AM
From: United States, Washington
All this points to opportunity for a new political movement. Maybe not in 2008, but next elections can allow a new political movement, with a HUMANITARIAN, DEMOCRATIC, & TRANSPARENT platform to propose an alternative to the traditional clientelistic parties.

We have an ALTERNATIVE CHOICE now, e.g. the MIUCA, but their reach in the population is limited, at best. BUt we do have a choice. IF only people who are dissillussioned came out and voted for the MIUCA or 4 VIA, it will lessen the grip of the three traditional parties on DOminican Politics.

Vota 16 el 16!
Written by: soundessential, 8 May 2008 10:58 AM
From: Dominican Republic
So we're basically choosing between half lies or all lies. I think getting halfway sounds much better than getting nowhere.

Or in other words we're choosing between a president that will dine you and then take you to a motel versus one that takes you straight to the motel.
Written by: baldoria23, 8 May 2008 11:11 AM
From: United States, Washington
Gente, there's more than the PLD and the PRD... At least in the first round. You're not happy? THen send a message by voting for another party. Abstaining only strengthens the main parties. You don't like the lies? you don't like the corruption? you don't like the continued poverty and growing inequality? You don't like the lack of representation & the arrogance of those in power? Then vote for GUILLERMO MORENO! At least we will be sending a message to the PLD and PRD that WE'RE FED UP!

Abstaining does nothing, and voting for the lesser of two evils, is supporting the status quo, which I think we're all in agreement if sub-optimal!

Yes, the pictures are unflattering :-)
Written by: DennisC, 8 May 2008 11:22 AM
From: United States
I just cannot picture how the Dominican people can even muster to think to put the PRD in power once more, after leaving the country in total devastation and bankrupcy in their last term 2000-2004 with the Hippo man, and where this candidate suddenly found a fortune nobody knew he had previous to that government, and where this PRD candidate was also integral part of those
terrible years the Dominican people went through.
Cannot imagine having the dominicans voting for the PRD once more.
Written by: josean, 8 May 2008 11:25 AM
From: United States
Note: this post below seems out of sink because the previous part has gone missing. Apparently a form of journalistic renditioning or possiblly sent to Guantanamo!

This is the problem with our country, people have been conditioned to think that they should be grateful to the government for stealing the publics Cake via taxation and corruption and returning to them a few of the crumbs.

I will tell you how much of your own hard earned money you can have back and how to spend it and you better be grateful you illiterate peasants! I am from "Nueva Yol y yo se mejol!"
Written by: juanb, 8 May 2008 11:30 AM
From: Dominican Republic
I, for one, strongly agree that we must find an alternative to the two party system that we suffer from today. I do not agree, however, that the answer is to vote for an alternative on the 16th. The danger in so doing is to make possible the formation of some sort of unholy alliance between the PRD and the others. SInce all the PRD wants to do is to carve up the country and put the pieces in their pockets, they of course won't mind having to share the booty with a few others. The would rather steal some, than none. What needs to be done is that immediately after the election, WE, THE PEOPLE, should start to stand up for what we want for our country (education, transparency, honesty from our government) and if we don't start to see a change in the first 6 months of the new term, we should actively work towards empowering a third party, by first finding a good candidate, NOW, and having him speak out all the time and make the pueblo aware of what is and what could be.
Written by: TexasBill, 8 May 2008 1:25 PM
From: United States, Killeen, TX - Home of the 1st Cavalry
juanb;
The ideahas merit, providing the very astute politicos don't wage a counterattack of increased defamation of character against the proposed candidate for the2012 elections. Than there is the building of a party of individuals which are dedicated to the propositions you outline.
Begin with daily FULL PAGE ADS which identify those in thecurrent government who fail to meet the rigid standards necessary to bring about the changes needed. Cite those cases where government hasn't/doesn't respond to the real needs of the people. I don't mean the subsidies that area currently used to mollify the public, but the school system, what they teach and how they teach the materaial provided in the textbooks(???). Emphasize the lack of good management in the ministries, the overload of employees who just sit there and do nothing while being overpaid. Continuously point out the deficiencies of the administration of justice, of the police force and their reprhensible law enforcement.
TB
Written by: juanb, 8 May 2008 2:34 PM
From: Dominican Republic
How about these two articles (numbers 3 and11)in today's DR1.com. I have excerpted parts of each

#3 Bruno Wilhelm Speck, an international expert on electoral systems and party financing said that public funding (of elections) needs to come with responsibility and accountability, which is not the Dominican case. He criticized the fact that the Dominican system, including the judiciary, is completely politicized. "What we have here is a vicious circle. The political parties are not accountable, the electoral justice is not in control, and the citizenry and the media are not interested," he commented.

#11 Clave newspaper reports that the arrest took place after either the US Drug Enforcement Agency or Judge Luciano's older son, pilot Carlos Enrique Luciano Corominas called in to tip off the authorities about the money smuggling.
Written by: juanb, 8 May 2008 2:35 PM
From: Dominican Republic
Clave says that the DEA was watching the airplane and that six months ago it warned of a US$1 million consignment that was aborted when a high-ranking military officer, now stripped of his rank, warned the pilot and met him at the airport, picking him up after arrival. Clave says that sources indicate this was the same Ovalles who was arrested on 30 April.
Clave reports that the Cessna costs around US$200,000, and reveals that Luciano Corominas is the owner of a Porsche, and has taken a RD$12 million bank loan and paid back half. Officially, he works as a civil registry officer in Boca Chica on a salary of RD$35,000 a month.
Clave reports that the District Prosecutors have not shown any concern about the origin of the money. If there is no such interest, the case will end up being resolved with the mere payment of a fine.
Clave said that Luciano Corominas was not available for comment to the press.

We need a population that realizes the effect of these things and a gov't that ca
Written by: juanb, 8 May 2008 2:39 PM
From: Dominican Republic
and a government led by people that care. That is what we need, rather than some idiot complaining about the Metro.
Written by: BASTA, 8 May 2008 2:50 PM
From: Dominican Republic, =Ghetto/Legalize Drugs
The Metro and all the other crap = failed nation before and now. Better Bush than lie-onel.
Written by: BASTA, 8 May 2008 2:51 PM
From: Dominican Republic, =Ghetto/Legalize Drugs
Me for one could never vote for a gay president.
Written by: juanb, 8 May 2008 3:06 PM
From: Dominican Republic
Now there's some intelligent feedback.
Written by: baldoria23, 8 May 2008 3:31 PM
From: United States, Washington
These elections (like any other) are an opportunity to send a message. Don't think that all minor parties are out to be bought-out by the minor ones. If we give MIUCA a chance, I am confident, form what I've seen and heard from them is a party of integrity and clear DEMOCRATIC vision.

I know that one never knows how the future will turn out, but I do know that if the PLD and the PRD see a party like MIUCA getting 2-3%, they'll have to pay attention next time around! and also the MIUCA will be able to claim a partial success on which they can build on.

Don't throw out the baby w/ the bath water. A vote is a power tool, we just need to channel it the right way. So For those thinking of a post-election strategy, please continue, but lets not give up on these elections...

Vota 16 el 16!
Written by: josean, 8 May 2008 3:36 PM
From: United States
"That is what we need, rather than some idiot complaining about the Metro."

and I would add:

As well as the idiots defending the idiots who built it!
Written by: Edward, 8 May 2008 4:35 PM
From: United States, Faux News: Unfair Imbalance
This so-called expert must be a Balaguerista who's jealous of the centrist PLD and the social democratic PRD. Well dude DR is not going back to right-wing authoritarianism! LOL!
Written by: BASTA, 8 May 2008 4:42 PM
From: Dominican Republic, =Ghetto/Legalize Drugs
If you come across a lawyer buried up to his neck in sand – what does he need? More sand- maybe I doubt that would even shut lio-nels’ lying mouth.
Written by: baldoria23, 8 May 2008 5:03 PM
From: United States, Washington
Well, I always say moderation is the best course of action. We should see the positives and negatives in both candidates. If anyone says that one side is completely WRONG or RIGHT, they're trying to hide something, are ill-informed, are ideologues that can't see reality for what it is, or are completely manipulable by the different elites.

With that said, Leonel is not the Devil; and Miguel will probably continue many of the things the PLD has implemented. At the same time, there are HUGE policy, corruption, and representational flaws with both the PRD and the PLD. Given these shortcomings, should we give some other party a chance? To me it does, but I'm very optimistic and idealistic. I trust what the MIUCA & Guillermo Moreno propose. Both the PRD and the PLD claim to represent & fight for the interests of all sectors of society, but the thing is that some groups' interests are contrary to others'.
Written by: baldoria23, 8 May 2008 5:06 PM
From: United States, Washington
The MIUCA has never claimed their policies will benefit all - they want to reduce inquality, invest in public services, increase transparency, accountability & representation, and reduce our dependence on the U.S. by developing internal market and building links with other countries (e.g. LAC, Asia, Africa, and EU). Within these ideas, the MIUCA openly says some sectors of society will be hurt, but these are the sectors that have been stealing from the public. They also acknowledge that the oligarchy will cry "foul", but what can be expected from those who currently benefit from the people's misery?

Despite these sectors complaining, the masses will benefit from improved education, preventive healthcare, public safety (police), and better jobs (industrial and agricultural), and better governance overall.

That's a trade I'm willing to make! let the few hurt a little, and the many benefit a lot!
Written by: soundessential, 8 May 2008 6:05 PM
From: Dominican Republic
"they want to reduce inquality, invest in public services, increase transparency, accountability & representation, and reduce our dependence on the U.S. by developing internal market and building links with other countries (e.g. LAC, Asia, Africa, and EU)"
----------------
Isn't this what the PLD promised long time ago... in theory everything seems simple yet it becomes chaos when they get to office.

BASTA
Bush = Hipolito
Two bodies, same idiot.
Written by: BASTA, 8 May 2008 6:10 PM
From: Dominican Republic, =Ghetto/Legalize Drugs
And the butt part= Lio-nel Joto
Sorry Bush and his father = the devil
Written by: BASTA, 8 May 2008 6:13 PM
From: Dominican Republic, =Ghetto/Legalize Drugs
As well as the idiots defending the idiots who built it!

By the way - what happened to all those plans?
Written by: josean, 8 May 2008 7:27 PM
From: United States
BASTA

The plans for the METRO are right next to the one for the Artificial Island, which will break ground on May 17th if the people are insane enough to reelect this gang of improvisers!
Written by: JRRubirosa, 8 May 2008 8:04 PM
From: United States, Port Washington, LI (New York)
Josean: why Don't You complain better about Your real country???

Don't get the point why if You are not Dominican 100% You care so much about our progress.

Written by: ladronaso, 8 May 2008 9:09 PM
From: United States
I am a skeptic and cynic. I don't believe in any politician especially Dominican Politician, but I am also a realist and a pragmatist. And though Leonel has not stepped up to the plate in fighting corruption and providing more for the poor, however giving the helm to the PRD or any other party at this time would be detrimental to the progress of the country. We all have our gripes about LF, but the truth is that we are better off today as a whole (looking at the big picture) then we were during Mejia's or Balaguer's government.

And as juanb, 8 May 2008 11:30 AM stated if government does not begin to produce measurable benefits or to prioritize, then WE Dominicans should begin to take action to replace Government. No not with the PRD, PLD, PRSC or MUICA a new party that is forward thinking equitable and free of pecuniary interest and of compromise.
Written by: baldoria23, 9 May 2008 12:00 AM
From: United States, Washington
People, some of you are falling in the trap that PLD = progress, and everyone else is a step backward. I propose that voting for the PLD, PRD, or PRSC is a vote for the status quo. Yes the PLD is not a step forward. You want a more democratic system? do you want more transparency? do you want a stronger middle class? do you want better public services? do you want a an autonomous bureaucracy? do you want a president with less power? then VOTE for someone else besides the PLD, PRD, or PRSC. The MIUCA is the ONLY party proprosing real instutional change- e.g. taking pwr away from the pres and creating CHECKS & BALANCES! In other words, creating strong institutions to stop the pres from going off on a whim and building a metro, giving away buses, covering for their buddies selling drugs, and so on.

THe problem is, THE PRESIDENT HAS TOO MUCH POWER. Who but the MIUCA, I ask, is proposing to CUT the presidents' power? Ig nothing else, vote for the MIUCA b/c of that.
Written by: josean, 9 May 2008 12:23 AM
From: United States
baldoria23

I am with you 100%!
Written by: ladronaso, 9 May 2008 6:21 AM
From: United States
They all propose, but when seated in power they become like the rest. Corrupt. Dominican Born and Bread are incapable of being president. Society taints the entire batch.

Written by: baldoria23, 9 May 2008 6:37 AM
From: United States, Washington
Yes, ladronazo, they all propose, but that's like saying all men cheat on their wives... So what are we suppose to do? We should Shop around, until we find an honest candidate/party. If the person we vote for turns out NOT to fullfill his/her campaign promises, then we vote hime/her out next election.

THere is an element of risk in voting. When someone has been in power, we can look back at their track record and decide on that- that's called retrospective voting; however, when it's someone like the MIUCA, that has NEVER been in pwr, then we need to look at the political platform being offered. The MIUCA is the ONLY party propossing massive institutional reform. They see the shortcomings of the status quo; they feel that part of the problem is that power is too centralized, and they want to create more checks on the president and DECENTRALIZE power away from the president and closer to the people. I've never heard any other candidate mention anything like that.

Vota 16 el 16!
Written by: Damiandominguez, 9 May 2008 11:33 AM
From: United States
It is not true that the Dominican people have to choose the lesser evil as Mr. Catrain said. There is a clear alternative to the traditional parties ant that is GUILLERMO MORENO. The comment he make just come to perpetuate what the elite wants the people to think and that is that only the traditional corruption could govern the country. As I have being able to hear and read Mr. Moreno is able to "conceptualize"
Written by: josean, 9 May 2008 1:13 PM
From: United States
Damiandominguez

Excellent comment!
Written by: DennisC, 9 May 2008 2:07 PM
From: United States
Yeah!!
Great comment,
the thing is, what those words will translate to, once Guillermo Moreno or anybody else will do once in power to excercise those words, while feeling the pressure of the powerful who put them in power, let's not get blinded by words we all have heard before.

Any president if he wants to stay long in power, must make compromises with those powerful groups, who have been themselves in power for decades, while the NEW PRESIDENT, JUST CAME IN.
What Guillermo Moreno, with all those bright ideas is going to do?
Lionel learned about it, Mejia was already one of them, Balaguer played with all of them, Jorge Blanco was blinded by that power, (once himself a serious lawyer in Santiago), while another president was so overwhelmed by everything, he ended up shooting himself.

Let's be real here
Written by: baldoria23, 9 May 2008 2:44 PM
From: United States, Washington
All the examples you've mention came from traditional parties. And as I mentioned above, this type of mentality leads to abstention, which I believe is the worst consequence. We need to fight for a political movement that embodies the principles of Democracy - which excludes ALL traditional parties that seek the presidency to enrich themselves and their followers, not to build stronger institutions, not to decentralize resources or power, not to ask people "What do you want? and come help us design a solution..."

Yes, theories of masses and elites do say that once "new elites", who claim to be the new representatives of the people, gain power, they turn as bad as the "old elites". Well, the only way we can break out of this mold is to create institutions to oversee and limit the actions of the "elites". That's why I support the MIUCA which is targetting to create checks & balances, an autonomous bureaucracy, and include people in the decision making process.
Written by: ladronaso, 9 May 2008 9:05 PM
From: United States
I am aware of how democracies work. A government of the people for the people and by the people. A government with checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. I am aware that there exist a risk when we vote. But unfortunately we have a country that is incapable of producing a leader that "at some point in his life has not imbrued himself in corruption".

The Dominican society is one which corruption is at every level. Corruption becomes a mandate handed to all who hold any official position. I'm sure somewhere there exist a sacrosanct palimpsest or secret book with creed of "Best Corrupt Practices".

The simple reason that most of those who seek and gain high level political positions are not of meek and humble means. They usually emerge from the echelons of the elite, or they are privileged individuals or sycophants who out of political favors have risen to prominence.
Written by: ladronaso, 9 May 2008 9:07 PM
From: United States
(continued)
If this is the case, how is a President who has Dirty hands, going to be able to uphold the law of the land, when he too can be implicated at the drop of a hat? The analogous relationship of the elite and corruption is obvious at every level of society. For it is the elite, for the sake of prominence and wealth, have sacrificed truth, honor and dignity.

What the Republic needs is a humble individual of modest means with testicles of steel. An individual willing to take action against any and all regardless of status or relationships established. One who can pass a rigorous integrity test. One that is transparent. One that has nothing to gain or loose from his decisions. One that veers from the status quo. One that is not a demagogue. One that has insignificant political baggage or political skeletons in the closet. One that at the smallest infraction of the law will recuse any judge or official for dereliction of duty.
Written by: ladronaso, 9 May 2008 9:08 PM
From: United States
(continued)
What I'm saying is, as juanb, 8 May 2008 11:30 AM stated:
"We should actively work towards empowering a third party, by first finding a good candidate, NOW"

That we Dominicans specifically those who live abroad should become more proactive in the politics governing our country. We need to create a voice that can be heard. A voice that will be respected both here and there! A voice that will contribute to the future of our country. We need to organize ourselves into a viable entity capable of stimulating change.
Written by: josean, 9 May 2008 9:23 PM
From: United States
ladronazo

In the quote below ,with the precision of laser guidance, has hit the nail on the proverbial head!


"That we Dominicans specifically those who live abroad should become more proactive in the politics governing our country. We need to create a voice that can be heard. A voice that will be respected both here and there! A voice that will contribute to the future of our country. We need to organize ourselves into a viable entity capable of stimulating change."

Written by: baldoria23, 10 May 2008 12:02 AM
From: United States, Washington
Ladronazo, look @ Guillermo Moreno, and try to find any corruption allegations. And FYI, Leonel comes from VERY humble starts.

You don't have to wait till tomorrow, we have good candidate TODAY.
Written by: ladronaso, 10 May 2008 9:37 AM
From: United States
I concur with:
DennisC, 9 May 2008 2:07 PM
"Any president if he wants to stay long in power, must make ""compromises"" with those powerful groups, who have been themselves in power for decades, while the NEW PRESIDENT, JUST CAME IN."

Compromises, compromises, compromises Is the point I have been trying to make. Lets get real. These compromises have implications on the integrity of all the individual involved. Once in power reality hits and they are faced with repayment for favors. Every political action involves an opportunity cost and thus a repayment to someone. The issue now becomes when and how will it be repaid. Today tomorrow, money integrity, honor, dignity, or power?

Second, I don't believe initially a president with less power is a solution, rather a president who will be equitable in the use of his power. Less power will only cause havoc as others will scramble to pick up any loose power elements.
Written by: ladronaso, 10 May 2008 9:38 AM
From: United States
(continued)
A real and viable Presidential prospect will be a protean tech savvy individual. Worldly and well versed in government, political and social affairs. One with street smarts but with the gravitas of a world leader able to articulate on all levels. An individual rising from the synergy of a vast progressive social movement with momentum and financial backing to take the government by a force. Not brute force! But FORCE of JUSTICE and TRUTH. This individual must have a vast network of human capital working as volunteers in areas such as, recruitment, reconnaissance, Information technology, data and news proliferation, and dissemination of information.
Written by: baldoria23, 10 May 2008 12:51 PM
From: United States, Washington
Counting that a prsident will use his power "equitably" is having too much faith, more than what I have. Checks and balances ensure dialogue, help transparency, and can also help the inclusion of people in the decision-making process.

The president doesn't have to be a tech-genious, just have a good team to assess him on issues and policies. But having checks a balances ensures the avoidance of MAJOR catastrophes. There will be mistakes, but not as major as Plan Renove, The Metro, The Airplanes, Jorge Blanco, Pepe Goico. If the president's power is not reduce, there's not guarantee that these tragedies will not reoccur.

Just have a little faith, and vote for MIUCA. You may be surprise with what you find, if we can help the MIUCA get 2-3% of the vote. That will give the Left a strong card to play going forward.
Written by: ladronaso, 10 May 2008 3:09 PM
From: United States
When I said tech savvy, I didn't mean literally. I meant the President should be in touch with the Information Age. With technological resources and mediums available to him. From my point of view everyone in political circles in the DR is only there for self interest and not to be a true Public servant.

If you dig deep enough behind every politician in the DR you will find enough dirt to fill the Mona passage.
Written by: josean, 10 May 2008 4:15 PM
From: United States
Damiandominguez, baldoria23,ladronazo

You gentlemen (excuse me if their is a lady) but I think all three of you are males, you are all right. I love the level of this discussion and the evident passion which you folks put into your arguments.

I real think people are more focused on the need for real change, much more so than in the recent past. I don't think that the same"o same'o is going to be good enough anymore. An example is the freedom of expression offered to the masses by the Internet. Many people are reading what we write here and although my posts are very elementary compared to most of yours people do read all of us.

It is amazing how much people have in common and want serious change. However sometimes the feel alone and isolated but with this medium at least I feel I am not and I feel empowered by all of you.

continues:
Written by: josean, 10 May 2008 4:16 PM
From: United States
I think our country is in the embryonic stage of real change happening in the not to distant future. We just must contribute to it in any way we can, and all the joking aside I truly feel most of you do in your own way each time you post here.
Written by: ladronaso, 10 May 2008 6:12 PM
From: United States
Josean

You are so very correct. Our country needs Real and drastic change. Our country needs to move away from, as you said "the same-o same-o". The power to change is here.... we just need to harness it.

Written by: chillaxin201 This user is banned, 10 May 2008 11:11 PM
From: Dominican Republic, Boycott Dominican Tourism
Either we have another revolution while the Americans Have there hands teid in the middle east our we are done...

Viva Caamaño, Chavez and Fidel
Written by: DennisC, 10 May 2008 11:37 PM
From: United States
Josean, and all the others writing about these fascinating issues,
this is the right moment, and the right time, when we can afford to bring in the open our opinions
of what would be the best path for our beloved country, where all of us were born, or so I assume we are.
and Josean is correct with his words that all start in an embrionic stage, could not have said it better, and the time is also right to mantain a position of no conformism, we can not tolerate any longer that so many people steal with this sort of immunity, and incredible yet, that those same people who already stole over and over , yet have the audacity to try for other comebacks.

Thanks for the internet, many voices will be heard like all of us, and somehow along the way, the change will must come with the right people.
Written by: Willduit, 11 May 2008 6:58 PM
From: Dominican Republic
I pray that the Dominicans all go out to vote for who ever they feel will advance the interests of the whole conuntry. I do know one thing that my family (for the first time in 30 years) have been able to send me a small package, right to my door. The package arrived with in a week's time from the US. There was nothing stolen from it. It was unbelievable and never happened in the past. I can not count how many gifts that were sent to me and my wife that had litterally disappered.
I love this country and the people of this country. They have treated me with love and kindness, I hope that they will particapate always in the democratic process. Stay positive and don't dwell on the negative. I have seen a lot of progress in 30 years. I see the Dominicans fat, and not slender anymore. Even the poorer ones have help from some agency, if needed. Many families have monitary assistance each month from their families in the U.S. Be responsible VOTE !!!!!!
Written by: Damiandominguez, 12 May 2008 5:21 PM
From: United States
We can not denied that The PRD and the PRSC have make Leonel look like the greatesd president ever for the Dominican Republic and we can not denied either that some changes have being made, but, the corruption, the electricity, the amiguismo, the inequality remains the same. I know that we need a radical change at all level, it will take time to do it, but, it could be done. Most people affiliate with a particular party just hoping to get a job, una botellita somewhere and that have to change...Let's send a signal and vote for MORENO!!!!AT LEAST IT'S A START.
Post Your Comment | Not a member? Create your account | Lost your password?
Write your opinion here. Please keep your comment relevant to this article. Please note that any comments which contain offensive language or discriminatory expressions may be edited/removed.
You must log in to post a comment:
Username Password