Santo Domingo.- Supreme Court president Jorge Subero yesterday threatened to resign if the Judicial Branch budget is cut by more RD$115 million, which in his view would harm the country’s system of Justice.
Asked if that reduction seeks to force him to step down, the Chief Justice said: “I don’t know, but they would obtain it through that route. Yes, of course, because I wouldn’t accept it under any circumstance, no reduction, and I’m not going to associate myself to a violation of the law; I don’t discard resigning.”
He said there’re plans to reduce RD$19.2 million from the high Court’s budget starting July 1, and warned that “that nonsense” would violate the Constitution, several laws and a presidential decree. “The information has come to our office, whose veracity we don’t doubt, that from July 1 this year the budget assigned to the Judicial Branch will be reduced RD$19.2 monthly until the end of the year.”
Violation
Subero affirmed that if the Judicial Branch budget is reduced, the authorities would be violating the articles of the Constitution that deal with the aspects of the independence and separation of the State Powers, its functional, administrative and budgetary autonomy, and the legal security.

And who is going to believe that you are going to give up, your cushy, grossly overpaid do nothing "job", with all kinds of perks, including free guarded transportation, tax free car import duties, daily expense stipends, free world travel, and a whole bunch of other goodies, we mortals would only dream of.
Good ahead, make my day, and quit!
Anyway, what justice system? Where?
Subero might be getting perks, but his is anything but a no-show job.
And he does it.
Hello! Who said anything about him being a no-show?
If he shows up, he is just a empty toga anyway, there is no such thing as "justice" in DR.
No brag, just fact.
what justice he`s he talking about..........
My major concern is in relation to evidence where under english type law , the most important factor is to examine and to test the evidence being brought before the accused . In the DR , false witness or perjury is rife and this , under english law is a crime that is punished severely . it should be the accusers who must bear the burden of proving beyong reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty.
My next concern is that a single judge can be swayed but a panel of judges less so and a jury even less so..and so many more cases must be heard by at least a panel of judges.
my next concern relates to the 85% of prisoners who have not been formally sentanced and also to the system of bail here .
i also have concerns about the selection of judges, the qualifications of lawyers and the lackof jurisprudence in the DR .