Santo Domingo.- A WikiLeaks cable reveals that Supreme Court (SJC) president Jorge Subero revealed to U.S. ambassadors Hans Hertell and Roland Bullen, that SJC vice president Rafael Luciano Pichardo was apparently involved in corruption.
Newspaper Caribe said the local TV news station SIN provided the cable, which affirms that Subero told the diplomats that Pichardo was trying to alter the ruling in the US$2.5 billion Baninter bank fraud case and that Pichardo had received US$40,000.
Excerpts of the leaked cable Caribe acquired from SIN:
78252 ONFIDENTIAL SANTO DOMINGO 002941 Date of cable: September 13, 2006 (Translation from Spanish)
Summary. In a wide spectrum call recently done by ambassadors Hertell and Bullen (DCM) related to Jorge Subero Isa, president of the Supreme Court of Law), the latter confidentially described the plans for a future strengthening of the judicial sector, detailed the fight against judicial corruption and stressed some of the most urgent topics on the reform that faces the Dominican Republic at the moment.
After the departure of the personnel pertaining to the Department of State and the USAID which had accompanied the ambassadors, Subero revealed to Hertell and to Bullen that the vice president of the SCJ, Rafael Luciano Pichardo, seems to be deeply involved in the official corruption and is possibly trying to subvert the trial which at present is carried out against the individuals implicated in the fraudulent collapse of the Intercontinental Bank (Baninter), in 2003. However, Subero suggested that the Dominican Government would not take any action against Pichardo. The embassy investigates if the revocation of Pichardo’s visa would be appropriate. End of the summary.
The good news
(U) Subero started the meeting directly attributing the rise in the Dominican economy (rate of growth of 9% of the GDP) to the improvements in the judicial sector carried out by the programs of the USAID.
He suggested that if it weren’t for the support of the Untied States government, the progress in the fight against the judicial corruption in the last nine years would have been little. His final conclusion was that the “moral assistance” provided by the United States is, in fact, more valuable than the monetary assistance, considering it an “incalculable value.”
The bad news
Although the meeting that followed maintained this perception, it revealed Subero’s Achilles heel, he wasn’t willing to directly confront corruption at the high levels of the Government.
The embassy received, without having requested it, illegal recordings that seem to form part of a campaign of disrepute against Pichardo, with the suggestion that others were trying to influence their votes in the Court. A partial transcription was apparently also given to newspaper Digital Clave.
Although Pichardo’s own recorded comments donot contain any signs of non ethical, illegal activity or judicial, the subsequent article of Clave Digital was sufficiently harmful for the embassy to consider prudent to request Subero’s opinion on the topic.
In response Subero noted that Pichardo had admitted to him, as well as to other judges of the SCJ, that he had accepted $40,000 dollars but didn’t mention anybody’s name, and that it hadn’t been in exchange for anything, explicitly or implicitly.
Subero also noted that two of Pichardo’s sons also were involved by accepting larges sums of money and that he knows that Pichardo asked the judge who headed the criminal trial against Baninter “to have certain flexibility” as far as the motions of the defense.
Subero also believes, but cannot prove it, that the defense lawyer for Baninter, who is also advisor to the President, Vinicio “Vincho” Castillo, is trying to orchestrate Subero’s replacement with Pichardo as head of the SCJ, in an attempt to improve the Court’s inclination towards the Baninter defendant in appeal.
Drug link
On April 30, 2008 Pichardo’s son Rafael Alberto Luciano Corominas was arrested together with Juan José Martín Gómez, upon returning from Puerto Rico in a small plane, registry HI-831, piloted by Ovalles Tejada, from whom Customs agents seized US$580,000.

More Dominican wiki leaks coming, fasten your seat belts that the darts will start flying soon.
This will be more fun that the best nude novela.
Question: How come cable is dated 2006 and the famous trial happened in 2003 with Baninter? that is also when mega corrupt US ambassador Hertell (so they say) was in high gear.
Here's a bit more news on this topic.
http://www.acento.com.do/index.ph....avoreceria-acusados-Baninter.html
When you take away the fat from the bone the main points seem to be that Pichardo was trying to get the top judicial job and Subero was defending it and that it seems that Pichardo tried to subvert the Baninter trial and may have been paid to do it .
The story of his son just proves the family unworthiness.
These are canalla and I hope before I die I see justice. Not more injustice.
Atabey, " start behaving better"
1) Corruption is inbred in these scum. They shouldn't have been allowed to breed
2) They are devoid of any moral fiber, you can't just get morals
3) They wear corruption as a badge of honor, this is what gives Dominicans their macho mentality
4) They need to ALL go to jail, period.
They have used their Groundhogs day mentality well in the Baninter case.
For several years they kept saying that the country also had the $1.5B quasi financial Baninter debt, on top of all the other 'loan' debt.
Now, they do not even remember it. What a bunch of 10 year old children running your country. Must be another proud day for all Dominicans.
But what is your point??
El contenido también será publicado por Acento.com.do, en base a una alianza con Grupo SIN, que dirige Fernando Hasbún.
http://www.acento.com.do/index.ph....ominicanos.html?nstrack=sid:13798|met:300|cat:0|order:2
1. Father was corruption, son was drug related. Yet, the father could be the VP of High Court in DR.
2. Lie-onel has no couragement to nail down those bad apples.
3. Consequenly, DR is in big trouble if people not fighting for this type of corruption.