Venezuela's president Hugo Chavez with Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa. (Photo: MinCi Venezuela)
FROM LATIN BUSINESS CHRONICLE
The leftist leaders in Latin America are not just a threat to free markets, but also to democracy.
In Ecuador, thousands of pro-government protesters last week forced lawmakers to flee congress. In Bolivia, pro-government protesters have forced a leading opposition governor into hiding and are increasingly attacking other government critics. In Nicaragua, the new leftist president asked lawmakers to grant him direct powers over the police and army (a move that was rejected by the opposition-controlled congress).
All this while Venezuela's president Hugo Chavez has achieved unprecedented power, restricting media, controlling the judicial and legislative branches and - for the next 18 months - ruling by decree.
Tragically for both foreign investors and local citizens, parts of Latin America are now again returning to authoritarianism after being dominated by free markets and democratic rule in the 1990s.
The leftist leaders of Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela have attacked foreign investors not only with their economic policies, but also by reducing democracy, the political equivalent of free markets.
Only in open societies with a strong and independent civil society (media, business chambers, non-governmental organizations and political parties) and independent judiciaries, can business thrive best. Only democratic socities can provide a minimum of fair rules of the game for investors - as opposed to the secret, shady dealmakings of authoritarian regimes.
Mix populist policies of huge and overbloated state companies with restrictions on media and the opposition - like we are seeing in Venezuela - and you have a perfect recipe for boosting corruption. Venezuela is now the second-most corrupt country in Latin America (after Haiti), according to the latest ranking from Transparency International. In 1999, when Hugo Chavez assumed Venezuela's presidency, the country was the fifth-most corrupt country in the region.
And needless to say, corruption is a major factor undermining an even playing-field for business, small or large.
Just as economic freedom is essential, if not sufficient, for political freedom - as Milton Friedman tirelessly pointed out - so too it can be argued that polical freedom is key to the longterm success of economic freedom.
Nicaragua's president Daniel Ortega has so far not followed his fellow leftists in Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela in terms of economic policy and we hope he is smart enough to not do so, either. Nicaragua, the second-poorest country in Latin America, desperately needs foreign investment. And you don't get that by scaring them off with Chaveznomics.
Bolivia, the third-poorest economy in Latin America, is becoming poorer. Ecuador and Venezuela, in turn, are becoming even more dependent on oil - a commodity infamous for price volatility. To make things worse, economic policies are also curtailing efficient production of oil (thanks to nationalizations and expropriations). Chaveznomics also brings higher inflation - another major problem for foreign investors and local citizens alike.
Latin America already tried authoritarianism and it only brought human tragedy and economic deterioration. Making the same mistakes again won't make them any better.
From: New York, NY
I agree w/ many of the points in the article. It's problematic that undemocratic means are used to advance a human agenda. Dem. addresses the problem of tyranny, and if it is undone, then authoritarian governments will emerge. At the same time, where were the criticism when the poor suffered under "liberal-dem"? Only when Int'l K is affected do the US and financial mkts complain. Now they are lumping the poor n their cries, but they only care about themselves.
Mayb this unDem. way will hel
Written by: Raul R, 6 Feb 2007 7:47 PM
From: Santiago
The concept of democracy is laudible but in Latin America it has been perverted and hyjacked.If the so called democratic governments are there representing the will of the majority, how come the majority always comes out the loser.It can't be because the majority chooses to end up the looser.These societies have been hyjacked by forces that control information and politicians.The even playing field must be created to benefit business small and large but most of all the majority of the people.
From: Brooklyn
the writer of this article cites all the problems that arose in the latin american political sphere since "being dominated by free markets and democratic rule in the 1990s."what the author fails to mention is that this is a direct result of implementation of neo-liberal policies throughout the region that have left the average latin american worker without any protection from unethical business practices in their respective countries.free markets and democracy on paper (cont'd)
From: Brooklyn
(cont'd) are one thing but if there is no willingness from local governments to protect workers' rights and enforce livable wages then the end result will be alienation from the political process by the poor, the overwhelming majority in the region.there has to be a fair balance between attracting investors and protecting the fundamental rights of the average latin american worker.this is the gyst as to why neo-liberalism has failed to strengthen democracy in the region.
From: Santiago, Santiago
What the article and the respondants fail to mention is that the Political Animal (those who rule by whatever method) , like anySalesman, has no conscience and hold himself above any responsibility for his actions in office.
It is not the fault pf the system of government nor economics that fails to fulfil thedreams of the populations and entrepreneurs, but the fault lies with those who implement the short term solutions to social and economic problems being faced.
From: Brooklyn
without question corruption is one of the reasons why democracy has being eroded in latin america.but one must take into account that in most latin nations the installation of democratic regimes coincided with the implementation of neo-liberal policies.in this context to many in latin america they are, unjustifiably, intertwined,hence the failure of neo-liberalism in the region to improve people's lives is seen by many as a failure of democracy itself.besides, as difficult as it is to (reign)
From: Brooklyn
reign in corruption at home what kind of avenues are open to local populations in latin america to hold multi-national corporations or foreign investors accountable when there has been wrongdoing under neo-liberal policies? none.it's ok for these corporations to come in and exploit local populations and eco-systems as long as investors elsewhere are content.the frustration with this situation is one of the components that helps fuel the left in latin america.
From: Madrid
Is it me, or is it then the same people that write for this web news page the same ones that write comments on the articles? How come everyone seems to have the same style and voice in their writing style? Of course someone will say, it is just me hallucinating!
Cheers!
From: Brooklyn, New York
History will prove chavez wrong... or right. Capitalism has driven many into poverty in LA and many Anti-US Socialist leaders such as Juan Bosch and Salvador Allende have not been allowed to succeed. Cuba would be a different place if it didn't have the US-led embargo! I believe in Democracy but i am not a capitalist, I am a socialist... France and Britain are socialist... so is Spain, its done wonders for them. The economic system of state has is different than the political mechanism.
From: USA
Mr. Franco how can you separate democracy from capitalism, they are interdependent when a country is democratic (unlike Cuba) its people prosper and become capitalist in an effort to improve their lives. The US embargo is nothing but an excuse by castro to not have to answer to the people as to why they live the way they do starving and imprisoned in their own island. Regarding Socialism just remember the Most prosperous nation in the world is Capitalist (USA) not socialist.
From: USA
To Cubano Libre:
It is a reality when you apply embargo and sanctions on to an Island such as Cuba, hoping they will revolt against a Tyrany and tople the gvt.the people are to suffer.(Ex SENATOR NJ TORRICELLI) theory did not work, Cuba was left to their own destiny. If there is no commerce the country will suffer poverty such is the case,
A good example ENGLAND ww2 by the U-boats & V-1,V-.2
German war machinery .Were it not for the USA,CANADA and
AUSTRALIA they would have starved. cont,.
From: USA
To Cubano Libre:
Democracy has nothing to do with Capitalism and i agree with Mr Franco. What you probably meant to say:capitalism vs comunism ,in that case i agree with you.Where Cuba has an
authoritarian comunist regime, same as Chavez, Castro's disiple
By the same token don't you classify Britain,France & Spain democratic capitalistic countries?.even thought two are monarchs ruled by prime ministers,still their gvts are socialiist.
Europe is just as prosperous as the USA .
Written by: Pepe32, 6 Sep 2008 4:31 PM
From: Dominican Republic
France does not have a socialist government and Spain prospered under the policies of the PP which is being destroyed by the socialist government of (mr bean) Zapatero.
Another note is that there is no comparison between what is called socialism in Europe with the free market and powerful Capitalistic interests of these nations,the true socialists like IU in Spain will never govern because anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows that Communism and radical socialism have been failures throughout the world so even if our current system is imperfect it is way better than the "ideals" that caused millions of deaths throughout the world and destroyed nations.
As far as Cuba's embargo though I personally oppose it ,it is a false excuse because Cuba can trade with many nations but the system the follow strangles liberty and free commerce (they do go hand in hand) and Cuba cannot compete in world markets so even though many countries would sell to Cuba they have little to pay with!
Mayb this unDem. way will hel
It is not the fault pf the system of government nor economics that fails to fulfil thedreams of the populations and entrepreneurs, but the fault lies with those who implement the short term solutions to social and economic problems being faced.
Cheers!
It is a reality when you apply embargo and sanctions on to an Island such as Cuba, hoping they will revolt against a Tyrany and tople the gvt.the people are to suffer.(Ex SENATOR NJ TORRICELLI) theory did not work, Cuba was left to their own destiny. If there is no commerce the country will suffer poverty such is the case,
A good example ENGLAND ww2 by the U-boats & V-1,V-.2
German war machinery .Were it not for the USA,CANADA and
AUSTRALIA they would have starved. cont,.
Democracy has nothing to do with Capitalism and i agree with Mr Franco. What you probably meant to say:capitalism vs comunism ,in that case i agree with you.Where Cuba has an
authoritarian comunist regime, same as Chavez, Castro's disiple
By the same token don't you classify Britain,France & Spain democratic capitalistic countries?.even thought two are monarchs ruled by prime ministers,still their gvts are socialiist.
Europe is just as prosperous as the USA .
Another note is that there is no comparison between what is called socialism in Europe with the free market and powerful Capitalistic interests of these nations,the true socialists like IU in Spain will never govern because anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows that Communism and radical socialism have been failures throughout the world so even if our current system is imperfect it is way better than the "ideals" that caused millions of deaths throughout the world and destroyed nations.
As far as Cuba's embargo though I personally oppose it ,it is a false excuse because Cuba can trade with many nations but the system the follow strangles liberty and free commerce (they do go hand in hand) and Cuba cannot compete in world markets so even though many countries would sell to Cuba they have little to pay with!