Washington.– Barack Obama routed Hillary Rodham Clinton in the racially charged South Carolina primary Saturday night, regaining campaign momentum in the prelude to a Feb. 5 coast-to-coast competition for more than 1,600 Democratic National Convention delegates.
"The choice in this election is not about regions or religions or genders," Obama said at a boisterous victory rally. "It's not about rich versus poor, young versus old and it's not about black versus white. It's about the past versus the future."
The audience chanted "Race doesn't matter" as it awaited Obama to make his appearance after rolling up 55 percent of the vote in a three-way race.
But it did, in a primary that shattered turnout records.
About half the voters were black, according to polling place interviews, and four out of five of them supported Obama. Black women turned out in particularly large numbers. Obama, the first-term Illinois senator, got about a quarter of the white vote while Clinton and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina split the rest.
Clinton flew to Nashville as the polls closed, and looked ahead. "Now the eyes of the country turn to Tennessee and the other states voting on Feb. 5," she said, adding "millions and millions of Americans are going to have their voices heard."
Edwards finished a distant third, a sharp setback in the state where he was born and scored a primary victory in his first presidential campaign four years ago. Even so, he vowed to remain in the race, his goal, he said, to "give voice to all those whose voices aren't being heard."
The victory was Obama's first since he won the kickoff Iowa caucuses on Jan. 3. Clinton, a New York senator and former first lady, scored an upset in the New Hampshire primary a few days later. They split the Nevada caucuses, she winning the turnout race, he gaining a one-delegate margin. In an historic race, she hopes to become the first woman to occupy the White House, and Obama is the strongest black contender in history.
The South Carolina primary marked the end of the first phase of the campaign for the Democratic nomination, a series of single-state contests that winnowed the field, conferred co-front-runner status on Clinton and Obama but had relatively few delegates at stake.

You can talk all u want about the DR being a racist country...not to say there's no racism...but not to the extent there is in the US. No one is talking about the fact that Leonel is a mulatto, no one really says so and so is an "afro-dominican"...we are just dominican regardless of color. The DR may not be as developed as the US, but at least when it comes to race...I think the US can learn a thing or two from the DR about looking past a person's color (even age...look at Balaguer).
While I don't disagree entirely with your assessment of theUS psche, I think you have emphasized the "status quo" of US political thinking and actions in a rather biased (please forgive the use of that word since it is not intended to denegrate you personally) manner.
There was a time when I would have agreed with you 100%. But, in light of Senator Obama's overwhelming win, both in Iowa and in South Carolina, coupled with the supportive rhetoric coming from the Kennedy Clan, I must confess it is entirely possible and probable that our next President of theUSA will be one of color.
I have been a Republican for the most of my adult life until recently when I, out of conscience thought and deliberation, became a devout Independent. Simply put, I became totally disgusted with the manner in which both parties were treating those whom they professed to serve for mostly personal reasons.
"It ain't over till the fat lady sings". Only time will tell.
TB
At this time in history, we are in a four-way squeeze from China, Russia, Central and South America and the Near-Eastern references in the economic arena. We DO need to "pull back" and change our ways in order to regain that which we have relinquished unknowingly and naively.
TB
Very soon now, I will hope for publication of an "ovraview of the Political Development in the USA" from thedays of the "Founding Fathers" to the present day.
The article will attempt ot marry the evolution of the Political philosophy and the economic development which took place at various junctions in the hostory of the US.
It will NOT be a "scholarly treatise" by any means, simply because I do not have the educational qualifications to do so.
it will be a "thumbnail sketch" of some of teh events and situations that have been paramount in the development of today's USA as I see it.
So don't expect anything more than both the good and the bad.
TB